As a result of tireless and well directed efforts from its professional communities, geography as a field of study experienced a tremendous revitalization during the past few decades. Collegiate geography educators, however, cannot afford to become satisfied; additional needs in both research and application persist if the discipline is to continue its evolutionary resurgence. One continuing question is: now that they have careers as professional geographers, how do collegiate geography graduates view their program experiences?
Specifically, for this investigation questions for selected topics and sub-topics (or areas) were: what was the extent of their initial exposure to these during their programs; how relevant were these to their current jobs; and what was the utility of including these in degree programs? Also, what types of expertise did they develop since graduation? The topics of interest were: other disciplines, geography, business, education, computers, and communications.
A collection of 181 academic and non-academic professional geographers provided their opinions about these questions. Their answers indicated that: (1) by far, communication, education, and computers had the highest ratings for utility, relevance, and expertise gained after graduation; (2) ratings for exposure during degree programs were comparably lower for all topics; and (3) the academics and non-academics, although from different occupational environments, agreed most of the time.
The discussion includes further detail about the ratings and focuses on how the two groups responded. Additional attention focuses on implications of the results in terms of the impacts on collegiate geography programs. The presentation concludes with recommendations for future research and application. / Ph. D.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/38136 |
Date | 06 June 2008 |
Creators | Heric, Matthew |
Contributors | Educational Research and Evaluation, Belli, Gabriella M., Fortune, Jimmie C., Wolfle, Lee M., Morrill, Robert W., Carstensen, Laurence W. |
Publisher | Virginia Tech |
Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
Language | English |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Dissertation, Text |
Format | viii, 110 leaves, BTD, application/pdf, application/pdf |
Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Relation | OCLC# 34834255, LD5655.V856_1996.H475.pdf |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds