Return to search

Soil loss and run-off in Umfolozi Game Reserve and the implications for game reserve management.

Two management blocks were set aside in Umfolozi Game Reserve



(UGR) to compare different management approaches. In one, the



non-cull block, a noninterventionist policy was followed and no



large mammals were removed, while the other, the cull block was



subjected to the same game removal treatment as the remainder of



the reserve. The main objectives of this study were to determine



the relationships between vegetation, soil surface variables and



both soil loss and rainfall run-off, to derive predictive models



for run-off and soil loss based on vegetation and soil surface



variables, to determine the relationship between different levels



of soil erosion and the production potential of soils, and to



determine the relationship between different levels of soil



erosion and herbaceous species diversity.



Rainfall simulator trials and natural run-off plots were used to



collect quantitative data on soil loss and run-off. Bivariate



scattergrams showed that the relationship between soil surface



and vegetation variables plotted against soil loss was



curvilinear. "Susceptibility to erosion" showed the highest



positive correlation, and "surface cover" the highest negative



correlation with soil loss. The relationship between annual



run-off and both the soil surface and vegetation variables was



also curvilinear, with "soil capping" showing the highest



positive and "litter cover" the highest negative correlation with



run-off. Using multiple regression analysis it was found that



"susceptibility to erosion" and



predictors of annual soil loss.



"surface cover" were the best



"Soil capping" and "percentage



contribution of



run-off.



forbs" were the best predictors of annual



No clear relationship between either soil loss and stocking rate,



or run-off and stocking rate was apparent in the two experimental



blocks, and the differences in soil loss and run-off could not be



explained by differences in stocking rate alone. There were



however defects in the experimental design which invalidated the assumption that the stocking ~ate diffe~entia1



management blocks would inc~ease with time.



between the two



Because of the above deficiency, an a1te~native study a~ea on the



weste~n bounda~y fence, which allowed fo~ pai~ed sampling sites



on eithe~ side of the fence, was chosen. Ge~lach t~oughs we~e



used to measu~e soil loss. The g~eatest va~iabi1ity in soil loss



was explained by the position of the plots on the slope ~athe~



than whethe~ the plots we~e in UGR o~ in adjacent KwaZu1u.



Simi1a~ly, diffe~ences in topog~aphy, ~athe~ than diffe~ences in



1anduse, exe~ted an ove~~iding effect on A-ho~izon depth, he~bage



accumulation and g~ass species ~ichness. Conside~ing the ~esu1ts



obtained, the opinion that a noninte~ventionist policy would lead



to a decline in vegetation p~oductivity and to a 10ng-te~m



~eduction in species dive~sity appea~s to be unfounded.



Finally, based on the data collected and on a ~eview of cu~~ent



scientific 1ite~atu~e, changes to the Natal Pa~ks Boa~d soils



policy and objectives a~e suggested, and the objectives a~e



t~ans1ated into ope~ationa1 management goals. / Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 1988.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ukzn/oai:http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za:10413/10907
Date January 1988
CreatorsVenter, Johan.
ContributorsTainton, Neil M., Schulze, Roland E.
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
Languageen_ZA
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds