Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:27:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
HumbertoLLF_DISSERT.pdf: 1093833 bytes, checksum: 064965fb9cf18de70b5382ae2a3f273c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-11-12 / In the Brazilian legal context, conflict resolution is studied and analyzed over a majority
jurisdictional view, which is one of the reasons of litigation culture that creates a jurisdictional
resolution hopeness. The practical impact of such reality is the loss of quality in the public
service of the judicial function, moved, as a rule, by the overcrowdings, slowness of legal
procedures and the relegation of peaceful resolution methods to peripheral plan. However, the
Federal Constitution of 1988, following the Ordinary Law constitutionalization phenomenon
provides specific guidance about the values towards the litigation resolution. The study,
therefore, aims to approach the constitutionalization of conflict resolution in order to identify,
through scientific and spiritual interpretation in conjunction with the systematic paradigm,
what are these values, as well as operation and legal representation and practice of these
measurements. In this sense, the thesis is to study the initial point of the analysis of conflict
theories and explanations about the culture of litigation matched with concepts of creation and
interpretation, constitutionalization, access to justice and social pacification public policies. It
is used for this purpose, the logical-deductive method with the aid of the dialectic immanent
in Law / No contexto jur?dico brasileiro, a solu??o de conflitos ? estudada e analisada sob uma ?tica
majorit?ria de judicialidade, raz?o pela qual se constata uma cultura demandista, cuja
esperan?a resolutiva reside essencialmente nos provimentos jurisdicionais. A repercuss?o
pr?tica de tal realidade ? a perda de qualidade no servi?o p?blico prestado pela fun??o judicial
do Estado, impulsionada, em regra, pelo abarrotamento do Poder Judici?rio, morosidade dos
procedimentos e relega??o de pr?ticas pac?ficas de resolu??o de controv?rsias a um plano
perif?rico. Por?m, a Constitui??o Federal de 1988, seguindo o fen?meno constitucionalizador
do direito ordin?rio, prev? orienta??es espec?ficas no que tange aos valores informadores da
solu??o de lit?gios. Tem, portanto, o presente trabalho o escopo de abordar a
constitucionaliza??o da solu??o pac?fica de conflitos no sentido de identificar, por interm?dio
da interpreta??o cient?fico-espiritual em conjunto com o paradigma sistem?tico, quais s?o tais
valores, bem como a operacionaliza??o e representa??o jur?dico-pr?tica dessas aferi??es.
Nesse sentido, a disserta??o tem como ponto de estudo inicial a an?lise das teorias do conflito
e esclarecimentos acerca da cultura da litig?ncia compatibilizados com conceitos de
constitui??o e interpreta??o, constitucionaliza??o, acesso ? justi?a e pol?ticas p?blicas de
pacifica??o social. Utiliza-se, para tal fim, o m?todo l?gico-dedutivo com o aux?lio da
dial?tica imanente ? Ci?ncia Jur?dica
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/13943 |
| Date | 12 November 2012 |
| Creators | Lucena Filho, Humberto Lima de |
| Contributors | CPF:37925423404, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6950519368299462, Saraiva, Paulo Lopo, CPF:01182528449, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6450878641547863, Gurgel, Yara Maria Pereira, CPF:80675840449, http://lattes.cnpq.br/8686260157736966, Bonif?cio, Artur Cortez |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, UFRN, BR, Constitui??o e Garantias de Direitos |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds