Return to search

Dosimetry Intercomparison Using a 35-keV X-Ray Synchrotron Beam

Significance: Photon activated Auger electron therapy utilizes a keV-ranged, monoenergetic x-ray beam, and radiobiological and animal experiments studying this therapy require accurate dosimetry techniques. However, there exist few dosimetry protocols for low-energy x-ray beams. This research intended to use the CAMD synchrotron as a source of monochromatic, 35-keV x-rays and test dosimetry techniques of film and ion chamber. The hypothesis of my research was that depth-dose measured in a PMMA phantom using an air-equivalent ionization chamber and radiochromic film dosimeters in a PMMA phantom irradiated by a 35-keV, monochromatic x-ray beam will agree to within 5% of each other and to within 5% of dose determined from fluence-scaled Monte Carlo dose simulations.
Methods: The narrow beam produced on the CAMD tomography beamline (0.1×2.8 cm2) was effectively broadened (2.5×2.8 cm2) by vertically oscillating experimental apparatus. Beam energy selected by the monochromator was verified using a Compton scatterer and powder diffraction methods. Depth-dose in PMMA was measured by an air-equivalent ion chamber using a modified AAPMs TG-61 (100-300 kV) formalism and by Gafchromic EBT film using 125-kVp calibration curves. Depth-dose was also determined from scaling MCNP5 Monte Carlo output by fluence measured using a NaI detector.
Results: The powder diffraction energy measurement agreed closest to the monochromators setting (mean = -0.1±0.3 keV). Depth-doses performed on 5 separate experimental dates showed that beam fluence did not accurately scale to synchrotron ring current between dates.
Depth-dose measurements from ion chamber and film at 2 cm resulted in film-measured dose underestimating ion-chamber measured dose by an average of 5.0±2.1%. Fractional Monte Carlo depth-dose simulations agreed well with ion chamber and film measurements, with maximum disagreements of 3.9% at 9.0-cm depth and 0.9% at 8.25 cm, respectively. Fluence-scaled, Monte Carlo dose determination overestimated ion
chamber-measured depth-dose by 6.4±0.8% and overestimated film-measured depth-dose by 9.1±0.7%.
Conclusions: Results of this research were unable to prove or disprove the hypothesis regarding 5% agreement of ion chamber and film dose measurements. Results also proved the hypothesis false for achieving 5% agreement between either ion chamber-measured dose or film-measured dose and dose determined from fluence-scaled Monte Carlo simulations.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-01182008-133454
Date22 January 2008
CreatorsOves, Scott
ContributorsMaurice King, Joseph Dugas, Leslie Butler, Erno Sajo, Kenneth R. Hogstrom
PublisherLSU
Source SetsLouisiana State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-01182008-133454/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.002 seconds