Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T13:51:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
RichardMA_TESE.pdf: 3793202 bytes, checksum: 5890dda5635196fda6b027474ba9793b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011-12-28 / This thesis aimed to evaluate the implementation of the Food Acquisition Program(PAA) through CONAB RN in the period of 2003-2010 with the perception of all agents involved in the implementation of the government program.For the methodological trajectory it was adopted a descriptive bibliographical and documentary approach with triangular qualitative and quantitative, also called evaluative research.The theoretical model was supported by the authors Draibe (2001), Aguilar and Ander-Egg (1994) and Silva(2001), among others, that focused on family farming and evaluation of implementation of public policy having as a category of analysis the size implementation of policy and the latter divided into 10 theoretical dimensions.The universe consisted of three groups: the first were the managers and technicians from CONAB(RN and Brasilia), totaling 15 subjects. The second group was of associations/cooperatives that participated in the programin 2010, totaling a sample in each access of 15 representatives. The third group of subjects totaled with 309 representatives of governmental and non-governmental organizations that received donations of food for the same period. Semi-structured interviews and forms were adopted as instruments of data collection.The data were processed qualitatively by the analysis of content (interviews and documents) and quantitatively by means of statistical tests that allowed inferences and adoption of frequencies. Among the key find ingests that the program is not standing as a structure supported by planning. The interests of the performers do not necessarily converge with the objectives of the Food Acquisition Program (PAA). A shockof goals was identified (within the same program) when comparingthe financial agent (Ministry of Rural Development and of Social Development and Fight Against Hunger Ministry r) and the executor, CONAB/RN. Within the assessed dimensions, the most fragileis the sub-managerial decision-making and Organizational Environment and internal assessment, still deserves attention the sizeof logistical and operational Subsystem, as this also proved weak.The focusin the quest toexpand thequantificationof the resultsof theFood Acquisition Program (PAA)by CONAB/RN does forget a quality management focused on what really should be:the compliance with the institutional objectives of the government program.Finally, the perspective for the traded implementation should be re-examined because excessive discretion by managers along with technical staff has characterized there al role of the Food Acquisition Program (PAA) as public policy. We conclude that the implementation model, which apparently aggregates values to the benefitted citizens, has weakened the context of work on family farms having the management model of the implementation process be reviewed by the Federal Government and point too ther paths, which have as a guide line the emancipation and developmentof the field or in the field andat the same time enables the reduction of nutritional deficiency of beneficiaries in a balanced and coherent way / A presente Tese objetivou avaliar a implementa??o do Programa de Aquisi??o de Alimentos (PAA) pela CONAB RN no per?odo 2003-2010 na percep??o dos atores envolvidos no processo de execu??o do programa governamental. Para o percurso metodol?gico foi adotada uma pesquisa bibliografia-descritiva e documental com abordagem triangular qualitativa e quantitativa, denominada tamb?m de pesquisa avaliativa. O modelo te?rico foi suportado pelos autores Draibe (2001), Aguilar e Ander Egg (1994) e Silva (2001), al?m de outros que abordaram o tema agricultura familiar e avalia??o de implementa??o de politica p?blica, tendo como categoria de an?lise a dimens?o implementa??o da politica e esta dividida em 10 dimens?es te?ricas. O universo foi constitu?do de tr?s grupos, o primeiro foram os gestores e t?cnicos da CONAB (RN e Bras?lia), totalizando 15 sujeitos. O segundo grupo foi de associa??es/cooperativas que participaram do programa em 2010, totalizando uma amostra por acesso de 15 representantes. O terceiro grupo de sujeitos totalizou com 309 representantes de institui??es governamentais e n?o governamentais que receberam doa??o de alimentos no mesmo per?odo. Foi adotado como instrumento de coleta de dados entrevistas semi estruturadas e formul?rios. Os dados foram tratados qualitativamente pela analise de conte?dos (entrevistas e documentos) e quantitativamente por meio de testes estat?sticos que possibilitaram infer?ncias e ado??o de frequ?ncias. Dentre os principais resultados tem-se que o programa n?o est? situando como uma estrutura suportada pelo planejamento. Os interesses dos executores n?o necessariamente convergem com os objetivos do PAA. Identificou-se choque de objetivos (do mesmo programa) quando comparado o agente financiador (Minist?rio do Desenvolvimento Agr?rio e Minist?rio de Desenvolvimento Social e Combate ? Fome) e a executora, CONAB RN. Dentro das dimens?es avaliadas a mais fragilizada ? o subsistema gerencial decis?rio e Ambiente Organizacional e avalia??o interna, ainda merece destaque a dimens?o Subsistema log?stico e operacional, pois este tamb?m, se mostrou debilitado. O foco na busca pela amplia??o da quantifica??o dos resultados do PAA pela CONAB RN faz esquecer uma gest?o de qualidade focada no que deveria realmente ser, o atendimento aos objetivos institucionais do programa governamental. Por fim, a perspectiva da implementa??o negociada deve ser reanalisada, pois a discricionariedade excessiva pelos gestores junto aos t?cnicos vem descaracterizando o real papel do PAA enquanto politica p?blica. Conclui-se que o modelo de implementa??o aparentemente agregador de valores aos cidad?os beneficiados, vem fragilizando o contexto do trabalho na agricultura familiar, tendo o modelo de gest?o do processo de implementa??o ser revisto pelo Governo Federal e apontar para outros caminhos, que tenham como eixo norteador a emancipa??o e o desenvolvimento do/no campo e ao mesmo tempo possibilite a redu??o da defici?ncia nutricional dos benefici?rios de forma equilibrada e coerente
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/12077 |
| Date | January 2012 |
| Creators | Ara?jo, Richard Medeiros de |
| Contributors | CPF:03203069415, http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4780080H5, Fernandes, Antonio Sergio Araujo, CPF:50918125553, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6801465547614647, Cruz, Dalcy da Silva, CPF:01605950459, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7873985618977852, Souza, Lincoln Moraes de, CPF:05944538368, http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4794937H2, Souza, Tereza de, CPF:03428222415, http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4793245A5, Esmeraldo, Gema Galgani Silveira Leite, CPF:06051804315, http://lattes.cnpq.br/9529052562255476, Alloufa, Jom?ria Mata de Lima |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Administra??o, UFRN, BR, Pol?ticas e Gest?o P?blicas; Gest?o Organizacional |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0172 seconds