ITC/USA 2014 Conference Proceedings / The Fiftieth Annual International Telemetering Conference and Technical Exhibition / October 20-23, 2014 / Town and Country Resort & Convention Center, San Diego, CA / In this work we evaluated the performance of different water filling algorithms. We have selected four power allocation algorithms: Conventional water-filling (CWF), Constant power water-filling, Inverse Water-filling (IWF), and Adaptive Iterative Water-Filling (AIWF) algorithms. Capacity is the performance metric we used to compare the above algorithms by taking the optimality of transmission power allocation to each sub-channel into account. The power allocation can be calculated with a reference of the water level value that has different approaches for different algorithms. The water level can either be fixed once it is found, or it may be adaptive or different for different sub-channels. Hence, the results show that the adaptive iterative water filling (AIWF) algorithm has a better effect on the performance of MIMO-OFDM system by allocating power adaptively.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:arizona.edu/oai:arizona.openrepository.com:10150/577502 |
Date | 10 1900 |
Creators | Kassa, Hailu Belay, Mariam, Dereje H., Moazzami, Farzad, Astatke, Yacob |
Contributors | Addis Ababa University, Morgan State University |
Publisher | International Foundation for Telemetering |
Source Sets | University of Arizona |
Language | en_US |
Detected Language | English |
Type | text, Proceedings |
Rights | Copyright © held by the author; distribution rights International Foundation for Telemetering |
Relation | http://www.telemetry.org/ |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds