This thesis explores the Rapid Recommendations process, a new responsive way of creating clinical practice guidelines. / Healthcare workers rely on clinical practice guidelines to inform their practice. However, most guidelines are not trustworthy when judged by accepted standards and they typically take several years to produce. Guideline trustworthiness is undermined by panel members who often have conflicts of interest, by including representation from only a subset of stakeholders, by failing to examine the entirety of the evidence systematically, and by rapid obsolescence. Further, they are often difficult for users to understand in limited time.
Rather than updating guidance on a fixed schedule, the Rapid Recommendations approach involves continuous monitoring of the literature and produces guidelines in response to new potentially practice-changing evidence. A collaborative network of clinicians, methodologists, and patients respond by rapidly producing trustworthy evidence syntheses and guidance. We have identified efficiencies at every step of the guideline development process.
The guideline panel does not include anyone with a financial conflict of interest and there are strict limits professional and intellectual conflicts. Systematic reviews are produced on the relative effects of each option, on prognosis, and on patient values and preferences with the explicit intent to inform the question at hand. The panel also considers practical issues. Rapid Recommendations are published in a concise multilayered user-friendly format headed by an interactive infographic that contains all of the necessary information for users need to make informed decisions at the point of care. The guideline is published simultaneously in print and electronically, including decision aids that can be used at the point of care and integrated into electronic medical records.
In this thesis, you will find a selection of exemplary publications relevant to the Rapid Recommendations process. We show that a responsive approach to rapid and trustworthy guideline creation is possible. It represents a way forward from the current limitations that plague most current clinical practice guidelines. / Thesis / Candidate in Philosophy / Healthcare workers often decide what to do in practice based on the advice of experts through clinical practice guidelines. However, most clinical practice guidelines are not completely trustworthy. Guideline authors often have conflicts of interest, do not include patients or patient views, and are created so slowly that they rapidly fall into obsolescence. This thesis explores a new way of developing clinical practice guidelines that we call Rapid Recommendations. Instead of creating them on a fixed schedule (i.e., every few years), they are created in response to new studies that might change practice. The scope is limited, and timelines are shorter, meaning that the guidelines are published sooner. The guideline authors include all stakeholders, including patients. None of the authors have any financial interests in the topic, and other conflicts are minimized. The guidelines are published on an expedited basis and in an accessible online multilayered format with infographics. This thesis includes a selection of exemplary publications relevant to the Rapid Recommendations process.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/25540 |
| Date | January 2020 |
| Creators | Siemieniuk, Reed Alexander Cunningham |
| Contributors | Guyatt, Gordon H., Health Research Methodology |
| Source Sets | McMaster University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds