This thesis deals with impacts on the applicability of evidence which results from violation of directives modifying the process of proofs of trial proceedings. The significance of proofs is crucial as by its means the reconstruction of the event of significance from the criminal law perspective is done. The condition for fulfillment of criminal trial proceedings purpose is a complete and proper determination of fact whereof there is just suspicion in the extent necessary for issue of decision. At the same time it is necessary that the set rules were followed for purveyance, locking, implementation and evaluation of evidence as these rules represents guarantee of just law trial proceedings as the one of fundamental attribute of democratic legally consistent state. This thesis is divided into four main parts and preface and conclusion. First part deals with definition of the term proofs in trial proceedings, its meaning and purpose. Moreover it deals with legal form of proofs including constitutional and international law way out. It contains also listing of fundamental terms and principles controlling process of proofs and division of evidence from different perspectives. In second part of this thesis, the issue of admissibility of evidence is processed with which acquisition and application was...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:389023 |
| Date | January 2018 |
| Creators | Maříková, Marie |
| Contributors | Hořák, Jaromír, Pelc, Vladimír |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds