Local governments traditionally produce public services by using their own employees. Some public service reform proposals have
emphasized privatization and contracting out in order to improve efficiency and effectiveness of public services. Local governments have
principally contracted with private companies to deliver public services, however some have looked to other governments as a service provider.
Some municipalities build partnerships with other governments to produce particular services. Conversely, some local governments have decided to
become service providers for other governments in producing specific services. Although police, fire protection, and EMS have most often been
contracted to other governments, intergovernmental contracting gradually has been expanded to other services. Some governments prefer public
entities as a service provider to private companies in delivering specific services. Existing research has paid mostly attention to the
characteristics of governments that purchase particular services. Although several studies focus on contractual relationships between
governments, there are few studies that examine why some local governments become providers of public services to other governments. The purpose
of this study is twofold. First, it is to identify the characteristics of governments that choose to purchase from other governments. Second, it
clarifies why some municipalities decide to become providers of services to other governments. This study employs mixed method analyses.
Multinomial logistic regression analysis, form of a quantitative analysis, identifies some characteristics that are associated with governments'
decisions to purchase particular services from other governments. Qualitative analysis in the form of in-depth interviews, were conducted with
officials in seven cities to clarify why some local governments decide to provide particular services to other governments. Results show that
economic, political, and organizational factors influence the decisions to contract services out to other governments. Interview results reveal
that costs, production capacity, innovative ideas, new revenue sources, proximity, and economies of scale are important in understanding why
some local governments choose to be service providers for other governments. / A Dissertation submitted to the Askew School of Public Administration and Policy in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. / Fall Semester 2018. / November 13, 2018. / Contracting Out, Government Contracting, Public-Public Partnership / Includes bibliographical references. / William E. Klay, Professor Directing Dissertation; Randall G. Holcombe, University Representative;
Keon-Hyung Lee, Committee Member; David G. Berlan, Committee Member.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_661159 |
| Contributors | Lee, Jun Ki (author), Klay, William E. (professor directing dissertation), Holcombe, Randall G. (university representative), Lee, Keon-Hyung (committee member), Berlan, David G. (committee member), Florida State University (degree granting institution), College of Social Sciences and Public Policy (degree granting college), School of Public Administration and Policy (degree granting departmentdgg) |
| Publisher | Florida State University |
| Source Sets | Florida State University |
| Language | English, English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, text, doctoral thesis |
| Format | 1 online resource (183 pages), computer, application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds