Return to search

The antinomy of human freedom and moral restraint in Paul Ramsey's medical ethics /

Paul Ramsey's medical ethics is built from a philosophical antinomy: Premise, the human being is a creature of will; Proposition, the human will is a free will; Contrary Proposition, the human will is a not-free will. General, exceptionless rules of conduct function in Ramsey's thought as moral restraint to human freedom. The moral agent ought always to act in accord with the demands of agape; and not only once but as often as the same features of a decision/action arise. General rules guide and restrain human free will in a necessary way to assure an ordered and moral society. This antinomy-interpretation helps locate Ramsey in the theatre of ethical debate; it also is the key to criticism of Ramsey's rigid rules in medical ethics.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:QMM.68690
Date January 1982
CreatorsRedcliffe, Gary Lorne.
PublisherMcGill University
Source SetsLibrary and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation
Formatapplication/pdf
CoverageDoctor of Philosophy (Faculty of Religious Studies)
RightsAll items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
Relationalephsysno: 000147088, proquestno: AAINK61112, Theses scanned by UMI/ProQuest.

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds