Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-06-03T23:45:41Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
MoniqueLessaVieiraOlimpio_DISSERT.pdf: 43560008 bytes, checksum: 154e1d95b904adaa8baabb544465769c (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-06-07T19:45:43Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
MoniqueLessaVieiraOlimpio_DISSERT.pdf: 43560008 bytes, checksum: 154e1d95b904adaa8baabb544465769c (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-07T19:45:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
MoniqueLessaVieiraOlimpio_DISSERT.pdf: 43560008 bytes, checksum: 154e1d95b904adaa8baabb544465769c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-06-12 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES) / de intervir sobre o patrim?nio edificado, observa-se a prolifera??o de in?meras posturas
projetuais frente ? pr?-exist?ncia de valor patrimonial. Mas estes projetos de interven??o em
edifica??es de reconhecido valor patrimonial possuem alguma especificidade? ? poss?vel
identificar em que eles diferem (ou se diferem) de um projeto arquitet?nico n?o relacionado ?s
quest?es preservacionistas? Diante de in?meras contribui??es te?ricas sobre a tem?tica de
m?todos de projeta??o arquitet?nica, identificou-se uma escassez de estudos voltados,
especificamente, para projetos de interven??o em ?reas ou edifica??es de reconhecido valor
patrimonial. Evidenciou-se, ent?o, a necessidade de uma reflex?o sobre os procedimentos
metodol?gicos aplicados em um projeto de arquitetura, notadamente os voltados para a
preserva??o patrimonial. Esta discuss?o se reveste de uma import?ncia ainda maior, pois, em
?mbito nacional, algumas das recentes reflex?es sobre esse tipo de projeto apontam para uma
atua??o caracterizada, muitas vezes, pelo arb?trio e completa aus?ncia de rigor metodol?gico.
Logo, esta pesquisa trabalhou de forma conexa elementos te?rico-metodol?gicos da pr?tica
preservacionista e da tem?tica sobre m?todos de projeta??o arquitet?nica. Visando responder
as quest?es apresentadas, o recorte desta an?lise consiste no estudo de caso dos projetos de
interven??o do Terminal Mar?timo de Passageiros de Natal, do Antigo Pal?cio do Governo
(EDTAM) e do Antigo Hotel Central, situados na ?rea reconhecida como centro hist?rico da
cidade de Natal, no pol?gono de tombamento federal. Suas an?lises objetivam identificar os
procedimentos metodol?gicos registrados no produto final (representa??o gr?fica do projeto
arquitet?nico e demais documentos) entregue ao IPHAN/RN, ?rg?o respons?vel pela aprova??o
dos mesmos, checando se tais procedimentos refletem no resultado obtido e se compreendem a
complexidade das quest?es preservacionistas. As an?lises dos projetos corroboraram a hip?tese
da exist?ncia de especificidades no projeto de interven??o, diferindo do projeto do novo. A
principal delas refere-se ? pr?pria natureza do projeto, inerente ? rela??o dial?tica entre a
necessidade da preserva??o (dos valores patrimoniais identificados) e da moderniza??o
(adapta??o ? vida contempor?nea) dos bens patrimoniais. Esta rela??o, denominada nesta
disserta??o de ?restri??o radical?, deve (ou deveria) balizar as a??es projetuais e an?lises
t?cnicas do ?rg?o preservacionista. Entretanto, constatou-se que esta restri??o ficou mais clara
nos pareceres dos legisladores do que nas decis?es dos projetistas. Os legisladores estabelecem
a apresenta??o de documentos voltados para a identifica??o e contextualiza??o pr?via do im?vel
objeto de interven??o (Portaria N? 420, de 22 de dezembro de 2010), que oferecem (deveriam)
subs?dios para as decis?es projetuais. Contudo, foi poss?vel identificar na avalia??o dos
documentos uma desconex?o entre estes e as decis?es projetuais apresentadas. A justificativa
para isto ? a total aus?ncia de di?logo sobre os preceitos te?rico-metodol?gicos
preservacionistas, a nosso ver, parte preponderante dos procedimentos necess?rios ao processo
de projeta??o arquitet?nica de interven??o, devendo nortear as discuss?es projetuais entre
projetistas e legisladores. / In the midst of growing preservationist awareness, regarding methods of architectural
intervention of buildings with a recognized heritage value, there are numerous approaches on
how the original heritage value can be protected. However, can these intervention projects be
differentiated? Is it possible to identify how they differ (if in fact they do) from an architectural
project not related to preservation? Although there are numerous theoretical studies regarding
methods utilized in architectonical projects, there appear to be a lack of studies focused on an
architectural intervention exclusively focused on areas or edifications that have a recognized
heritage value, thereby requiring a reflection on which methodological procedures in an
architectonical project serve the purpose of the preservation of the historical aspects. This
discussion is of even greater importance because, at the national level, some recent discussions
on this type of architectural design seem arbitrary and lack methodological rigor. Therefore,
this research attempts to focus equally on the theoretical-methodological practices of
preservation as well as the architectural project methods. In an attempt to address these aspects,
the focus of this research centers on the case studies of the intervention projects of the maritime
passenger terminal of Natal (Terminal Mar?timo de Passageriros de Natal), the old government
hall (Palacio do Governo - EDTAM) and the old central hotel (Hotel Central) which are situated
in the area known as the historic downtown of the city of Natal, within the federal heritage
protection polygon. The analyses of these is intended to identify what methodological
procedures were recorded in the final product (in the graphical representation of the
architectural design and other documents) delivered to IPHAN / RN, the body responsible for
review and approval of these architectural projects, noting whether such procedures appear, in
some way, in the final product, and if an understanding of the complexity of preservation is
evident. The analyses of these projects corroborate the hypothesis that there are unique
characteristics, which must be addressed in the intervention project for preservation when
compared to new project design. The main characteristic to be addressed is related to the very
nature of the project. It is inherent in the dialectical relationship between the need to preserve
(the identified heritage values) and the need to modernize (making adaptations to contemporary
life). This relationship, denominated in this dissertation as "radical restraint", must, or at least
should, guide the actions in the project as well as the technical analyses of the preservationist
organization. However, this radical restriction appears more evident in the guidelines put forth
by legislators than in the decisions of designers. These legislators require the presentation of
documents, aimed at identifying and contextualizing intervention (Ordinance No. 420 of
December 22, 2010), that grant (or should grant) assistance in the decision making process. It
was evident in the analyses of these documents that there existed a disconnect between the
documents produced and the decisions made in the project. This fact can be seen in the total
absence of dialogue about theoretical-methodological preservationist principles, which, in our
view, is an essential element of the methodological procedures of the intervention project
needed to guide the legislative and project design discussions.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/20597 |
| Date | 12 June 2015 |
| Creators | Olimpio, Monique Lessa Vieira |
| Contributors | 78382734472, http://lattes.cnpq.br/3326160083213059, Veloso, Maisa Fernandes Dutra, 33559066468, http://lattes.cnpq.br/4974901249133556, Baeta, Rodrigo Espinha, 88306887620, http://lattes.cnpq.br/4493063220359178, Ara?jo, Natalia Miranda Vieira de |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ARQUITETURA E URBANISMO, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0032 seconds