Return to search

An evaluation of a community pharmacy based, pharmacist-led intervention package targeted to the patients' adherence status, to achieve and maintain target blood pressure (BP) control by optimising antihypertensive medicine adherence

Antihypertensive pharmacotherapy is associated with poor adherence. No validated method exists to establish patients’ likely adherence level. A systematic review and a single, Swedish community pharmacy practice-based pilot study were undertaken investigating blood pressure (BP) optimization from pharmacist-led, community pharmacy based antihypertensive adherence interventions titrated to individual patients. The systematic review showed generic interventions are often used for optimizing BP. Different intervention outcomes vary: positive, negative and no effect has been demonstrated. Pilot study participants (n=153) were categorised into adherence subgroups (A=Adherent, IR=Intentionally non adherent rational, II=Intentionally non-adherent irrational, U=Unintentionally non-adherent) based on responses to questionnaire format adherence screens. Interventions were designed intuitively to optimize adherence for each subgroup: changes in blood pressure and adherence attitudes were assessed. A significant reduction in mean systolic BP (SBP) (3 mmHg, P < 0.05), with no change in mean diastolic BP (DBP) was seen overall. However, outcomes varied with subgroup: adherence was enhanced in the U subgroup (decreased SBP: 3 mmHg; DBP: no change), but indications of a detrimental effect were observed in the II subgroup (SBP: no change; increased DBP: 3 mmHg). It is feasible to assign patients to different adherence subgroups in community pharmacy, which may optimize medicines adherence through personalization of interventions.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:bl.uk/oai:ethos.bl.uk:731824
Date January 2017
CreatorsAmirthalingam, Amirthan Rajakumaran Selliah
PublisherUniversity of Birmingham
Source SetsEthos UK
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation
Sourcehttp://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/7834/

Page generated in 0.0019 seconds