Return to search

Effects of electrical stimulation and testosterone on regeneration-associated gene expression and functional recovery in a rat model of sciatic nerve crush injury

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Although peripheral motoneurons are phenotypically endowed with robust regenerative capacity, functional recovery is often suboptimal following peripheral nerve injury (PNI). Research to date indicates that the greatest success in achieving full functional recovery will require the use of a combinatorial approach that can simultaneously target different aspects of the post-injury response. In general, the concept of a combinatorial approach to neural repair has been established in the scientific literature but has yet to be successfully applied in the clinical situation. Emerging evidence from animal studies supports the use of electrical stimulation (ES) and testosterone as one type of combinatorial treatment after crush injury to the facial nerve (CN VII). With the facial nerve injury model, we have previously demonstrated that ES and testosterone target different stages of the regeneration process and enhance functional recovery after facial nerve crush injury. What is currently unknown, but critical to determine, is the impact of a combinatorial treatment strategy of ES and testosterone on functional recovery after crush injury to the sciatic nerve, a mixed sensory and motor spinal nerve which is one of the most serious PNI clinical problems. The results of the present study indicate that either treatment alone or in combination positively impact motor recovery. With regard to molecular effects,single and combinatorial treatments differentially alter the expression of regeneration-associated genes following sciatic nerve crush injury relative to facial nerve injury. Thus, our data indicate that not all injuries equally respond to treatment. Furthermore, the results support the importance of treatment strategy development in an injury-dependent manner and based upon the functional characteristics of spinal vs. cranial nerves.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IUPUI/oai:scholarworks.iupui.edu:1805/5504
Date January 2014
CreatorsMeadows, Rena Marie
ContributorsXu, Xiao-Ming, Chen, Jinhui, Jones, Kathryn J., White, Fletcher A.
Source SetsIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis

Page generated in 0.0019 seconds