Return to search

Seasonal Patterns of Photosynthesis and Respiration in Atriplex confertifolia and Ceratoides lanata

Net photosynthesis and dark respiration studies were conducted on Atriplex confertifolia (Torr. and Frem.) S. Wats and Ceratoides lanata (Pursh) J.T. Howell under field and laboratory conditions. These woody species are commonly found in salt desert shrub communities of the Intermountain West. During these investigations, the effects of air temperature, plant moisture stress, soil water potential, irradiation, and plant phenological status were examined with respect to their influence on carbon dioxide (CO2 ) exchange.
Intensive field studies were carried out between April and October. This interval corresponded to the major period of physiological activity in both species. The factors of moisture stress and phenological status appeared to regulate photosynthesis and respiration on a seasonal basis. They set the limits within which daily CO2 exchange could take place. Diel patterns of CO2 exchange were primarily controlled by prevailing temperature and irradiation. Irradiation was more critical during the spring, and temperature became more limiting in the summer.
Two alternate photosynthetic strategies of dealing with existing harsh environmental conditions appeared to have evolved in Atriplex confertifolia and Ceratoides lanata. Atriplex confertifolia exhibited an endurance strategy whereby it continued moderate rates of photosynthesis throughout the season. Ceratoides lanata, in contrast, completed the majority of its net assimilation in the spring; then it was relatively inactive when moisture stress became great. These differences seemed to be correlated with water use efficiencies of both species.
Rates of net photosynthesis were greatest during the spring in both species. At that time CO2 fixation in Ceratoides lanata exceeded that of Atriplex confertifolia. Later in the year, photosynthetic rates were reduced; and the assimilation rate of Atriplex confertifolia was greater than that observed in Ceratoides lanata. These seasonal patterns of CO2 exchange offered an insight into differences between species using different assimilation pathways. Atriplex confertifolia utilizes the dicarboxylic acid pathway (C4) for carbon fixation, while Ceratoides lanata uses the pentose pathway (C3). Since both species can coexist in the same reasonably stable community, it appeared that both carboxylation pathways were efficient with respect to prevailing environmental conditions.
Atriplex confertifolia had lower net assimilation rates than C4 species from warmer climates. It carried on moderate rates of photosynthesis at low temperature (5 to 10 C), and it had relatively low thermal optima (15 to 27 C) for net photosynthesis. An acclimative shift in temperature optima was also noted. This photosynthetic pattern seemed to be related to the climatic conditions under which Atriplex confertifolia evolved.
Ceratoides lanata exhibited assimilation rates which were comparable to other C3 species in arid environments. As with Atriplex confertifolia, Ceratoides lanata carried on photosynthesis at relatively low temperatures, but it did not undergo an acclimative shift in the temperature optimum (15 C).
Both species were physiologically adapted to severe moisture stress. They carried out active photosynthesis and respiration at soil water potentials between -15 and -50 bars. As soil water potential decreased below -50 bars, CO2 exchange in Ceratoides lanata was curtailed. Photosynthesis and respiration continued at a moderate level in Atriplex confertifolia until soil water potential was reduced below -70 bars.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:UTAHS/oai:digitalcommons.usu.edu:etd-7473
Date01 May 1976
CreatorsWhite, Richard S.
PublisherDigitalCommons@USU
Source SetsUtah State University
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
SourceAll Graduate Theses and Dissertations
RightsCopyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact digitalcommons@usu.edu.

Page generated in 0.0059 seconds