Efficient organization requires rigorous and systematic information management, which encompasses information processing and decision making. Within the efforts in management science and informatics invested towards advancing the knowledge on, and providing assistance to decision making, this thesis focuses on the conceptualizations and techniques intended to facilitate the identification, evaluation, and selection of decisions during the earliest stages of information systems engineering, whereby the systems of interest are deployed to partly or fully automate various organizational processes, including information processing ones. The overall motivating problem that drove to, and that unites the various contributions presented in this thesis is how to better inform decision making and guide it towards decisions that will increase the quality (as evaluated both by the engineer and the stakeholders) of the information system being engineered.
Topics in two key related areas are therefore addressed. First, boundedly rational individuals cannot take engineering decisions by accounting for all information that may be, or actually is available to them. As their information processing abilities are limited and their perception biased, it is necessary to filter the available information to a manageable level, and to bring it to a format that facilitates the rigorous reasoning invested in decision making. Second, it is necessary to provide guidance on how to use the given information in decision making.
The first part of this thesis therefore focuses on conceptualizations that facilitate the identification of relevant information and its organization for subsequent analysis, all in the aim of achieving high quality of the system being engineered. In particular, Part I discusses, shows deficiencies, and accordingly revises the conceptual foundations of requirements engineering, a field of information systems engineering that focuses on the identification and analysis of requirements communicated by the stakeholders to the engineer of the system. The novelty of the suggested revision lies primarily in (i) the separation between functional and nonfunctional (i.e., quality) requirements grounded in a foundational ontology, (ii) the introduction of stakeholders' communicated attitudes as important sources of information for the evaluation of alternative requirements engineering decisions, (iii) the reformulation of the so-called ``requirements problem' -- which precisely defines when the requirements engineering effort is successfully completed -- to account for attitudes and nonfunctional requirements, and (iv) the recognition of the importance of defeasible reasoning in the search for a solution to the requirements problem. Acknowledging the importance of defeasible reasoning leads -- in Part II -- to the study of how defeasible reasoning can be incorporated into established decision making processes involved in the identification and analysis of requirements. Novelty in Part II lies mainly in (i) the use of argumentation and justification processes in the modeling and analysis of requirements, (ii) the combined use of design rationale approaches with argumentation and justification, (iii) the recognition that the clarity of arguments is variable (due to ambiguity, vagueness, synonymy, and overgenerality of information going into premises and conclusions in arguments), (iv) the definition of a number of techniques for the detection of unclear information and its clarification, and (v) the use of ``clarity' as a criterion for the discrimination among arguments. Part III shows how the conceptualizations and techniques introduced in Parts I and II are applied within and are relevant to the engineering of information systems, including those that rely on heterogenous and distributed components, as in service-oriented and agent-oriented computing.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BICfB/oai:fundp.ac.be:ETDFUNDP:FUNDPetd-06202008-145119 |
| Date | 19 March 2008 |
| Creators | Jureta, Ivan |
| Contributors | Schobbens, Pierre-Yves, Zimanyi, Esteban, Kolp, Manuel, Mylopoulos, John, Faulkner, Stephane |
| Publisher | FUNDP |
| Source Sets | Bibliothèque interuniversitaire de la Communauté française de Belgique |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://edoc.bib.ucl.ac.be:61/ETD-db/collection/available/FUNDPetd-06202008-145119/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, J'accepte que le texte de la th�se (ci-apr�s l'oeuvre), sous r�serve des parties couvertes par la confidentialit�, soit publi� dans le recueil �lectronique des th�ses FUNDP. A cette fin, je donne licence � FUNDP : - le droit de fixer et de reproduire l'oeuvre sur support �lectronique : logiciel ETD/db - le droit de communiquer l'oeuvre au public Cette licence, gratuite et non exclusive, est valable pour toute la dur�e de la propri�t� litt�raire et artistique, y compris ses �ventuelles prolongations, et pour le monde entier. Je conserve tous les autres droits pour la reproduction et la communication de la th�se, ainsi que le droit de l'utiliser dans de futurs travaux. Je certifie avoir obtenu, conform�ment � la l�gislation sur le droit d'auteur et aux exigences du droit � l'image, toutes les autorisations n�cessaires � la reproduction dans ma th�se d'images, de textes, et/ou de toute oeuvre prot�g�s par le droit d'auteur, et avoir obtenu les autorisations n�cessaires � leur communication � des tiers. Au cas o� un tiers est titulaire d'un droit de propri�t� intellectuelle sur tout ou partie de ma th�se, je certifie avoir obtenu son autorisation �crite pour l'exercice des droits mentionn�s ci-dessus. |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds