Return to search

Biomechanical investigation of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint

The human foot is a biomechanical marvel which forms the distal link in the lower limb kinematic chain. With its small polyarticular construct and flexibility, it supports the body and provides balance during walking. The first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is a vital joint in the forefoot for normal load transmission and energy efficient locomotion. Albeit a lot in literature about this joint, paucity still exists in the biomechanical aspects. Also, there is a speculation in the biomechanical world that the time integral component of pressure recorded from the plantar pressure measuring devices maybe representative of the shear force recorded from force platforms. The aim of the current study was to quantify the kinematics of the first MTPJ in three dimensions and the pedobarographic data under the first MTPJ during each sub-phase of stance in the gait cycle of normal subjects and to assess the correlation between the shear force from the force plate of the motion capture system with the variables from the barefoot plantar pressure measuring device. Similar quantification will be undertaken for the patients with isolated hallux rigidus. After obtaining ethical approval, 40 normal subjects (80 feet) and 6 patients with varying grades of hallux rigidus were recruited for the study. The equipment used to collect data included the Vicon® motion analysis system, AMTI® force plate and the emed® plantar pressure measuring device. Various checks were performed to establish the reliability of the system setup. Four trials from each foot were taken. Of the 320 total trials from the normal subjects, the trial numbers varied for specific tasks as some trials which were suitable for testing one objective might not be suitable for testing the other. One of the patients’ data could not be used as the data quality was below par due to issues with marker tracking. The correlation between the shear force from the force plate and the anthropometric measurements/parameters from the plantar pressure measuring device was performed using the statistical regression model. The Vicon® data of the whole stance phase revealed that the first MTPJ’s sagittal plane motion ranged from 9° of plantarflexion to 53° of dorsiflexion. In the coronal plane, the maximum pronation was 34° and supination was 31°. In the transverse plane, the maximum varus was 11° and the valgus was 24°. There were two dorsiflexion peaks; one at the Initial contact and the other at Pre-swing. The joint moved from supination to pronation and varus to valgus during the progression of stance phase from Initial contact to Pre-swing. Considering the emed®-m, there were four basic parameters namely the force, area, peak pressure and maximum mean pressure from which the other parameters were derived. Only the basic parameters accounted for the sub-phases of stance and it came to light that the force under the first MTPJ was maximum in the terminal stance (22.1%). For the whole stance phase, the first MTPJ contributed about 11% of the contact area, 14.5% of the mean area, 24% of the maximum force, 56% of the peak pressure, 63% of maximum mean pressure, 44% of Pressure-time integral, 14% of Force-time integral and 14% of mean force. The correlation equation with reasonable number of dependent variables obtained by the statistical regression model could account for only 46% of the shear force. Among the paired correlation equations with single dependent variable, the one with the mean force was the best and even this could only account for 31.1% of the shear force. Albeit 3 patients were having similar radiological grading of the pathology and 2 others falling into another grade, their objective data were diverse and couldn’t be grouped together. The normal kinematics of the first MTPJ and the pedobarographic data under the first MTPJ were quantified during each subphase of stance. Attempt to use one system alone instead of two to calculate the shear force did not provide satisfactory results. The patients’ data questions the use of radiology alone in deciding the management plan which is a common scenario in the current clinical setting.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:bl.uk/oai:ethos.bl.uk:642874
Date January 2014
CreatorsRamanathan, Arun Kumar
ContributorsAbboud, Rami ; Drew, Tim
PublisherUniversity of Dundee
Source SetsEthos UK
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation
Sourcehttps://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/38cf4165-ade6-472e-9d62-8c37b910f380

Page generated in 0.0037 seconds