The relationship between violence in family of origin and violence in current couple relations was investigated in an effort to simultaneously examine the effect of experiencing parent-to-child violence and witnessing interparental violence in adolescence on current enacted and experienced violence between partners. Hypotheses were tested on a nationally representative data set (1985 National Family Violence Survey), using a sample of 4,910 married participants. This study used gender-specific social learning and postmodernist perspectives within an overall feminist framework in examining the impact of experiences of violence in adolescence on couple relationships. In understanding violence, feminist theory was utilized to focus on the purpose violence serves, as a tool granted social legitimacy in the maintenance of status quo hierarchical rankings of superiors versus inferiors. A historical and cultural understanding of the evolution of gender was also utilized, and regarded as essential in holistically organizing present day experiences of family violence. The findings were significant across groups in the hypothesized order. The lowest level of violence in current intimate relations occurred for partners reporting no violence in adolescence in family of origin, while those who experienced parent-to-child violence or witnessed interparental violence in adolescence were more likely to report current partner violence. The highest levels of enacted and experienced violence in current couple relations occurred for married partners reporting both forms of violence in family of origin. The relationships between current physical and current verbal violence were the most dramatic in the study. The risk for enacted violence in current relations was overall higher than the risk for experienced violence for men, while for women the risk was higher for experienced violence. The discussion of results expound upon the assumptions of this study, arguing that spanking of children, violence against women, violence in general and other forms of domination are, overall, institutionalized phenomena in our society as they are endorsed by powerful groups and political institutions that justify them as necessary in the maintenance of an androcentric social order, one which, contrary to American ideals for democratic governance and inalienable rights for all, idealizes hierarchical rankings in the distribution of power and wealth. / A Dissertation Submitted to the Interdivisional Program in Marriage and Family Therapy in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of
Philosophy. / Spring Semester, 2004. / October 28, 2003. / Corporal punishment, Power, Gender, Couple violence, Family violence, Spanking / Includes bibliographical references. / Charles R. Figley, Professor Directing Dissertation; Joyce L. Carbonell, Outside Committee Member; Nicholas Mazza, Committee Member; Christine A. Readdick, Committee Member.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_176094 |
| Contributors | Staik, Athena (authoraut), Figley, Charles R. (professor directing dissertation), Carbonell, Joyce L. (outside committee member), Mazza, Nicholas (committee member), Readdick, Christine A. (committee member), Department of Family and Child Sciences (degree granting department), Florida State University (degree granting institution) |
| Publisher | Florida State University, Florida State University |
| Source Sets | Florida State University |
| Language | English, English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, text |
| Format | 1 online resource, computer, application/pdf |
| Rights | This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds