The main purpose of this study is to research the metaevaluation of special education evaluation in Kaohsiung Area¡¦s elementary schools. The theory was based on a lot of documents to built the metaevaluation standards of special education evaluation in the elementary schools, and then to analyzed the implemented situation in Kaohsiung Area¡¦s elementary schools.
This was a questionnaire survey study. The population was school special educators who participate in Kaohsiung Area¡¦s special education evaluation. There were convenience sampling 389 special educators in Kaohsiung Area¡¦s elementary schools to conduct questionnaires. Totally 296 valid questionnaires were collected and analyzed by SPSS 12.0 for Windows. They were also presented by descriptive statistics and examined by t-test and ANOVA.
According to the data analysis, the results of the study showed:
1. the implemented situation in Kaohsiung Area¡¦s elementary schools
¡]1¡^As a whole, the situation of implementing special education evaluation in Kaohsiung Area¡¦s elementary schools was fine, and ¡§utility¡¨ standards were the highest
¡]2¡^In ¡§utility¡¨ standards, the ¡§practical procedures¡¨ was the highest, but the ¡§cost effectiveness¡¨ was the lowest.
¡]3¡^In ¡§propriety¡¨ standards, the ¡§service orientation¡¨ was the highest, but the ¡§formal agreements¡®fiscal responsibility¡¨ was the lowest.
¡]4¡^In ¡§utility¡¨ standards, the ¡§evaluator credibility¡®report clarity¡¨ was the highest, but the ¡§evaluation indicators, report timeliness and dissemination¡¨ was the lowest.
¡]5¡^In ¡§accuracy¡¨ standards, the " valid information¡¨ was the highest, but the ¡§reliable information¡®impartial report¡¨ were the lowest.
2. Different background variable difference analysis
¡]1¡^Different genders and positions of elementary school special educators had no significant differences in four perspectives of evaluation standards.
¡]2¡^Different special educational background of elementary school special educators had inconsistent beliefs in ¡§feasibility¡¨, ¡§propriety¡¨ , and ¡§utility¡¨ levels
¡]3¡^Different working years of elementary school special educators had inconsistent beliefs in ¡§propriety¡¨ and ¡§accuracy¡¨,levels.
¡]4¡^Different numbers of special class in schools of elementary school special educators had significant differences in ¡§feasibility¡¨ levels.
¡]5¡^Different school location of elementary school special educators had significant differences in four perspectives of evaluation standards
¡]6¡^Different result of evaluation of elementary school special educators had different beliefs in four perspectives of special evaluation
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:NSYSU/oai:NSYSU:etd-0712111-142939 |
| Date | 12 July 2011 |
| Creators | Feng, I-Ping |
| Contributors | Pai-Lu Wu, Shu-Ching Yang, Chin-Ting Cheng |
| Publisher | NSYSU |
| Source Sets | NSYSU Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive |
| Language | Cholon |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0712111-142939 |
| Rights | not_available, Copyright information available at source archive |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds