Network attacks remain a constant threat to organizations around the globe. Intrusion detection systems provide a vital piece of the protection needed in order to fend off these attacks. Machine learning has become a popular method for developing new anomaly-based intrusion detection systems, and in recent years, deep learning has followed suit. Additionally, data fusion is often applied to intrusion detection systems in research, most often in the form of feature reduction, which can improve the accuracy and training times of classifiers. Another less common form of data fusion is decision fusion, where the outputs of multipe classifiers are fused into a more reliable result. Recent research has produced some contradictory results regarding the efficiency of traditional machine learning algorithms compared to deep learning algorithms. This study aims to investigate this problemand provide some clarity about the relative performance of a selection of classifier algorithms, namely artificial neural network, long short-term memory and random forest. Furthermore, two feature selection methods, namely correlation coefficient method and principal component analysis, as well as one decision fusion method in D-S evidence theory are tested. The majority of the feature selection methods fail to increase the accuracy of the implemented models, although the accuracy is not drastically reduced. Among the individual classifiers, random forest shows the best performance, obtaining an accuracy of 87,87%. Fusing the results with D-S evidence theory further improves this result, obtaining an accuracy of 88,56%, and proves particularly useful for reducing the number of false positives.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:mdh-54957 |
| Date | January 2021 |
| Creators | Hautsalo, Jesper |
| Publisher | Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för innovation, design och teknik |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds