Amicus Curiae e Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental (ADPF): O aprimoramento da legitimidade democrática e plural das decisões / Amicus Curiae and the Claim of Non-Compliance with a Fundamental Precept (ADPF): the search for democratic and pluralistic legitimacy in Brazilian Supreme Court rulings

Description

Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-24T13:32:13Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-24T16:47:39Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-24T17:31:21Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-27T11:40:49Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-27T12:31:51Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-27T13:03:16Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-27T18:08:08Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-28T12:13:08Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-28T14:22:47Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-28T14:31:57Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-28T14:37:46Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-28T19:04:28Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-11-30T18:58:21Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-12-04T14:43:23Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-12-05T14:11:15Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-12-11T18:47:11Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-12-14T11:25:05Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-12-14T13:50:33Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Submitted by Guilherme Pinho Ribeiro null ([e-mail]) on 2017-12-21T12:31:27Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Laura Odette Dorta Jardim null ([e-mail]) on 2018-01-17T19:11:34Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-17T19:11:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTAÇÃO - MESTRADO.pdf: 1336070 bytes, checksum: a8b2e437fd99b68d4719516234870f66 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-09-29 / Este trabalho investiga a atuação do amicus curiae no âmbito do controle concentrado de constitucionalidade e, mais particularmente, nas arguições de descumprimento de preceito fundamental (ADPFs) cujo mérito foi julgado pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) até julho de 2017. Inspirado em estudos empíricos que se debruçaram sobre o amicus curiae no direito norte-americano, especialmente no âmbito da Suprema Corte, são examinadas onze ADPFs, levantando-se os argumentos trazidos pelos principais atores do processo, aí inclusos os amici curiae, e verificando como esses argumentos reverberaram nas decisões da Corte. A dissertação está organizada em três capítulos. Os dois primeiros são de caráter propedêutico, ao passo que o terceiro encerra o centro da investigação. Naqueles, examinam-se, respectivamente, os traços principais da ADPF e do amicus curiae. Neste, procede-se ao exame detalhado das onze ADPFs selecionadas. As principais conclusões do estudo são as seguintes: os amici curiae apresentam argumentos novos no processo, embora invariavelmente também retomem argumentos já expressos por outros atores do processo; os argumentos dos amici são levados em consideração nas decisões dos ministros, embora de modo irregular e, por isso, imprevisível; não há correlação entre o desfecho majoritariamente defendido pelos amici em um dado processo e a decisão do STF, de modo que a chamada “teoria do barômetro” não é apta a explicar o impacto dos amici no processo decisório no universo aqui considerado. / This work investigates the participation of the amicus curiae in the Brazilian system of abstract judicial review, more particularly in the so-called arguição de descumprimento de preceito fundamental (literally, Claim of Non-Compliance with a Fundamental Precept, an action aimed at countering the violation of a fundamental constitutional norm, hereafter ADPF). The scope of the investigation is all the ADPFs having been decided with prejudice until July 2017, which amounts to eleven cases. The major source of inspiration for this work was a set of US empirical studies devoted to the amicus curiae, especially in the context of Supreme Court cases. The arguments raised by the different participants of the trial are listed and confronted with the votes of the Brazilian Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal, STF) ministers. The dissertation is divided in three chapters. The first two are introductory, examining the key features of the ADPF and of the amicus curiae in Brazilian law, whereas the third comprises the empirical examination of the ADPFs. The main results of the study are: the amici curiae have presented many new arguments in the context of each case, although they never fail to repeat arguments already voiced by other participants; the arguments of the amici are taken in consideration in the votes, but in an irregular and therefore unpredictable way; there is no correlation between the outcome expected by the amici in a case and the Court’s decision, which renders the so-called “Barometer Theory” unable to explain the impact of the amici on the decision process, at least within the set of decisions examined in this investigation.

Links & Downloads

1. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/152509
2. 000895979
3. 33004072068P9

Tags

Additional Fields

Identifer	oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/152509
Date	29 September 2017
Creators	Ribeiro, Guilherme Pinho
Contributors	Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Duarte Neto, José [UNESP]
Publisher	Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Source Sets	IBICT Brazilian ETDs
Language	Portuguese
Detected Language	English
Type	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Source	reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP, instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista, instacron:UNESP
Rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Relation	-1, -1