Return to search

Single cell interferon beta response variation with virus infection

<p> Viral infection and the subsequent immune responses such as the expression of interferon beta (<i>ifnb1</i>) show extreme levels of cell to cell variability. A fraction of cells get infected and a fraction of infected cells induce an <i>ifnb1</i> response. These responding cells then signal to coordinate appropriate immune responses required to clear infection. The mechanism of propagation of this response at the single cell level is critical to generate an appropriate defense against the virus, yet is incompletely understood. </p><p> Interesting work on cell to cell variability has been done using transfected <i>ifnb1</i> reporter constructs. However, this approach has several limitations. The reporter systems introduce multiple copies of the reporter construct in each cell, which does not reflect the conditions in the intact cells where only two of the interferon promoter and gene are present. This alters the <i>ifnb1</i> enhanceosome stoichiometry from the one present in a normal physiological environment, and potentially distorts the patterns of single cell responses observed. In addition, reporter constructs integrate the response that occur over many hours, which makes it difficult to measure the expression dynamics that occur early after exposure to infection. Such measurements in the intact cells would be helpful for understanding the mechanisms underlying the propagation of this immune response. </p><p> In order to obtain sensitive and accurate measurements of changes in gene expression in infected single cells, we used single-cell single-molecule mRNA imaging to directly and simultaneously count the transcripts of <i> ifnb1</i> and that of a virus (Newcastle disease virus) gene Hemagglutinin-neuraminidase hn . This experimental approach enabled us to measure the single-cell responses from the very early stages of infection, in primary immune cells. Simultaneous measurement of <i>ifnb1</i> and the viral gene hn high lighted the variation in responses across cells, the temporal evolution of the expression of the two genes and their single cell correlation following infection. </p><p> We find that the single cell <i>ifnb1</i> response to virus infection shows a temporally dispersed (asynchronous) pattern. A small fraction of infected cells respond very early and more <i>ifnb1</i> expressing cells are recruited at later time after infection. In contrast, the single <i> ifnb1</i> response to the toll like receptor stimulant LPS, follows a highly synchronous pattern, where in a large number of cells showed an <i> ifnb1</i> response around the same time after treatment. These results suggest that the temporal evolution of single cell <i>ifnb1</i> responses was likely dependent on the type of the inducing stimuli. Furthermore we observed that extracellular signaling plays an important role in introducing cell-to-cell variability in <i>ifnb1</i>gene induction in response to virus infection. Inhibition of extracellular signaling converted the response to virus infection into an early synchronous LPS-like response. Thus extracellular signaling shapes the temporally dispersed pattern of single cell <i> ifnb1</i> response to viral infection. </p><p> The pattern of <i>ifnb1</i> responses to virus infection involves an increase in the amplitude of the response per cell as well as an increase in the number of responding cells over time of infection. These properties may enable cells to fine tune the <i>ifnb1</i> responses gradually. This strategy of mounting an antiviral cytokine response may be useful in calibrating the immune response such that an appropriate antiviral response is generated and cellular toxicity resulting from excessive cytokine expression is usually avoided.</p>

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:PROQUEST/oai:pqdtoai.proquest.com:3617973
Date10 June 2014
CreatorsPatil, Sonali A.
PublisherIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Source SetsProQuest.com
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typethesis

Page generated in 0.002 seconds