This dissertation is concerned with Building Code, No. 183/2006 Sb., and especially in its amendment No. 350/2012 Sb. It specializes in territorial procedure itself which is covered in sections 84 till 96a of Building Code. This dissertation tries to find out what pros and cons of territorial procedure are after the aforementioned amendment. Chapter one lays down the basic terms and documents of territorial procedures on state ("Politika územního rozvoje"), regional ("Zásady územního rozvoje") and urban ("Územní plán") levels. It also covers special institute of "Regulační plan" which can be used on regional and/or urban level. Other parts of chapter one are "Územní rozhodnutí" which specifies the type of given intention in given place and "Veřejnoprávní smlouva" which can be translated as "public (law) contract". This contract enables applicants to make their intention come to effect on their own strength with Building Authority only checking the final state of the contract. At the end this contract has the same power and authority as standard legal act by the Building Authority. Chapter two is the crucial part of this dissertation. It takes separately individual instruments of territorial procedures that are concerned with positioning particular intention(s) and the procedure that is given to this...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:337178 |
| Date | January 2014 |
| Creators | Jiránek, Vojtěch |
| Contributors | Svoboda, Petr, Vedral, Josef |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds