Return to search

A systematic column performance comparison for the confirmation of opioids used in pain management by LC-MS

In this study, three different chromatographic column chemistries (C18, Pentafluorophenyl (PFP), Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography (HILIC)) were compared under optimal conditions to determine which stationary performed best in the separation and detection of a mixture of opioids using LC-MS. Furthermore, these stationary phases were examined in three different column technologies – traditional silica, porous shell, and porous polymer (PRP). The PRP column had the best peak shape for all 13 opioids and dominated for later-eluting compounds. In terms of column reproducibility, the Hamilton C18 column had the lowest %RSD values. The Kinetex HILIC produced the most theoretical plates and best resolution for polar compounds as did the Hamilton C18 for nonpolar compounds. Finally, Kinetex PFP and Hamilton PRP both demonstrated themselves as viable alternatives to the C18 column chemistry for analysis of this drug class.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:ETSU/oai:dc.etsu.edu:honors-1199
Date01 May 2014
CreatorsStallard, Derek
PublisherDigital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
Source SetsEast Tennessee State University
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
SourceUndergraduate Honors Theses
RightsCopyright by the authors., http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds