Background
Guidelines recommend the use of perfusion computed tomography (CT) to identify emergent large vessel ischemic stroke (ELVIS) patients who are likely to benefit from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) if they present within 6-24 hour (late window) of stroke onset. We aim to determine if the interrater and intrarater reliability among physicians when recommending EVT is significantly different when perfusion CT or non-perfusion CT is reviewed.
Methods
A total of 30 non-consecutive patients were selected from our institutional database comprising 3144 cranial CT scans (January 2018-August 2022) performed for acute stroke symptoms. The clinical and radiologic data of the 30 patients were presented in random order to a group of 29 physicians in two separate sessions at least three weeks apart. In each session, the physicians evaluated each patient once with automated perfusion images and once without. We used non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals and difference in agreement classification as criteria to suggest a difference between the Gwet AC1 statistics (κG).
Results
Twenty-nine raters successfully completed the first round of surveys, with all but one of them also completing the second. The interrater (κG) agreement amonth 29 raters is similar with non-perfusion CT neuroimaging compared to perfusion CT neuroimaging (κG = 0.487; 95% CI 0.327,0.647 and κG =0.552; 95% CI 0.430,0.675). The 95% confidence intervals overlapped and both κG signify moderate agreement. The intrarater agreement κG had overlapping 95% confidence intervals for all 28 raters. κG was either substantial or excellent (0.81-1) for 71.4% (20/28) of patients in both groups.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that automated perfusion images and quantitative values that are present in the perfusion CT neuroimaging but not in non-perfusion CT neuroimaging do not significantly affect the reliability of the decisions made by physicians on EVT for late window ELVIS patients. / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc) / Background and Methods
Strokes that are associated with a blood clot in the brain may be treated by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), a procedure that involves pulling the occlusion out. In this study we wanted to know whether a particular type of way to image the brain, perfusion computed tomography (CT) compared to plain CT makes a difference in how doctors decide on whether to treat these patients or not. Perfusion imaging comes at a cost and may not be available in all centers. Both imaging techniques are used to determine which patients would benefit from EVT (Endovascular Treatment). The goal of imaging is to confirm a stroke and assess whether a significant portion of the brain is still salvageable, as performing the procedure may not be beneficial otherwise.
Results and Conclusions
Our study suggests that the decisions made by physicians when reviewing patients with either imaging are comparable.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/29128 |
| Date | January 2023 |
| Creators | Diestro, Jose Danilo |
| Contributors | Farrokhyar, Forough, Health Research Methodology |
| Source Sets | McMaster University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0028 seconds