Return to search

The Strategic Nature of Politics

Scholarship shows that the social construction of crime is responsible for the
public’s demand for tougher criminal justice policies. Yet, there remains disagreement
over several key issues regarding the relationship between strategic communication
and the punitiveness of the mass public. Little is known about the magnitude and
direction of changes in punitive sentiment over the last 50 years. Moreover, there is
disagreement over when the public began to demand punitive solutions to crime over
alternative policies. Many scholars point the racial turmoil of the 1960s, but none
have shown conclusive evidence of any fundamental change in punitive sentiment.
Finally, there is disagreement over what type of strategic appeal is most effective at
shaping public opinion.
The argument of this research is that the democratic nature of American pol-
itics creates an environment where the competition of ideas flourish. Political ac-
tors can use several types of strategic communication (agenda-setting, persuasion,
priming, framing) to shape political outcomes. The effectiveness of an appeal does
not remain constant over time, but should evolve around systematic social changes—
environmental conditions and social norms. Thus, there is a time varying relationship
between various appeals and public opinion.
A content analysis of crime news in the New York Times provides measures
of four types of strategic messages. Instrumental factors such as the economy and
public policy are also shown to influence the public’s desire for punitive criminal
justice policies. A Bayesian changepoint model provides a means to test when, if any,fundamental change occurred in the public’s punitive sentiment. Contrary to most
accounts, the changepoint model identifies 1972 as having the highest probability of
a breakpoint suggesting a public backlash against the Supreme Court’s Furman vs.
Georgia decision to abolish the death penalty.
Estimates from a state-space model show that different types of messages in
the media shape punitive sentiment and that the effectiveness of racial primes and
presidential attention to crime changes over time. Moreover, these changes are shown
to be a function of changes in social context and norms suggesting ways to improve
political communication.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-12-6972
Date2009 December 1900
CreatorsRamirez, Mark Daniel
ContributorsPeterson, David
Source SetsTexas A and M University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeBook, Thesis, Electronic Dissertation, text
Formatapplication/pdf

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds