In the cell, as in in vitro, the final conformation of a protein is determined by it's amino acid sequence (1). Some isolated proteins can be denatured and refolded in vitro in absence of extrinsic factors. However, in order to fold in the cell, the newly synthesized polypeptide chain has to negotiate an environment far more complex than that faced by the unfolded chain in vitro. Cells have evolved proteins called “chaperones” to assist folding and assembly of polypeptides (2). Thus, the linear sequence of a protein not only contains information that specifies the final three-dimensional functional form, but also recognition motifs, which can be recognized by the cellular folding machinery.
The work reported in this thesis is aimed at understanding some aspects of recognition of target substrates by the cytosolic chaperone, SecB, which forms part of the protein translocation machinery in E. coli. The sec pathway is involved in both translocation of precursor proteins across and the insertion of integral membrane proteins into the cytoplasmic membrane (3).
Chapter one discusses some general aspects of protein folding and briefly describes chaperone systems, which have been extensively characterized in literature.
Chapter two discusses the effect of chaperone SecB on the refolding pathway of a model substrate protein barstar, whose folding pathway has been extensively characterized (4,5). The effect of SecB on the refolding kinetics of the small protein barstar (wild type) and
fluorescein labeled C82A (single Cys mutant) in 1 M guanidine hydrochloride at pH 7.0 at 25 °C has been investigated using fluorescence spectroscopy. We show that SecB does not bind either the native or the unfolded states of barstar but binds to late near-native intermediate (s) along the folding pathway. ESR studies and fluorescence anisotropy measurements show that SecB forms stable complexes with the near-native intermediate (s). For barstar, polypeptide collapse and formation of a hydrophobic surface are required for binding to SecB. Steady state polarization measurements indicated the presence of stable complexes of barstar bound to SecB. Studies on the spin labeled C82A show an immobilization of the spin label adduct at the 40th position of barstar, suggesting that the binding of SecB to barstar occurs in that region. SecB does not change the apparent rate constant of barstar refolding. The kinetic data for SecB binding to barstar are not consistent with simple kinetic partitioning models (6).
Chapter three discusses the energetics of substrate:SecB interactions using the following model protein substrates: unfolded RNase A, BPTI, partially folded disulfide intermediates of alpha-lactalbumin,. The thermodynamics of binding of unfolded polypeptides to the chaperone SecB were investigated in vitro by isothermal titration calorimetry and fluorescence spectroscopy. The heat capacity changes observed on binding the reduced and carboxamidomethylated forms of alpha-lactalbumin, BPTI, and RNase A were found to be -0.10, -0.29 and -0.41 kcal mol-1 K-1 respectively and suggest that between 7 and 29 residues are buried upon substrate binding to SecB. In all cases binding occurs with a stoichiometry of one polypeptide chain per monomer of SecB. The data are consistent with a model where SecB binds substrate molecules at an exposed hydrophobic cleft (7).
Chapter four discusses the thermodynamics of unfolding to gain insights into the mechanism of assembly and stability of the tetrameric structure. The thermodynamics of unfolding of SecB was studied as a function of protein concentration, by using high sensitivity-differential scanning calorimetry and spectroscopic methods. The thermal unfolding of tetrameric SecB is reversible and can be well described as a two-state transition in which the folded tetramer is converted directly to unfolded monomers. The
value of ACP obtained was 10.7 ± 0.7 kcal mol-1 K-1, which is amongst the highest measured for a multimeric protein. At 298 K, pH 7.4. the AG°U for the SecB tetramer is 27.9 ± 2 kcal mol-1. Denaturant mediated unfolding of SecB was found to be irreversible. The reactivity of the 4 solvent exposed free thiols in tetrameric SecB is salt dependent. The kinetics of reactivity suggests that these four Cysteines are in close proximity to each other and that these residues on each monomer are in chemically identical environments. The thermodynamic data suggest that SecB is a stable, well folded and tightly packed tetramer and that substrate binding occurs at a surface site rather than at an interior cavity (8).
Chapter five discusses the bound state conformation of a model protein substrate of SecB, bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI), as well as the conformation of SecB itself by using proximity relationships based on site-directed spin-labeling and pyrene fluorescence methods. BPTI is a 58 residue protein and contains 3 disulfide groups between residues 5 and 55, 14 and 38, and 30 and 51. Single disulfide mutants of BPTI were reduced and the free cysteines were labeled with either thiol-specific spin labels or pyrene maleimide. The relative proximity of labeled residues was studied using either electron spin resonance spectroscopy or fluorescence spectroscopy. The data suggest that SecB binds a collapsed coil of reduced unfolded BPTI, which then undergoes a structural rearrangement to a more extended state upon binding to SecB. Binding occurs at multiple sites on the substrate and the binding site on each SecB monomer accommodates less than 21 substrate residues. In addition, we have labeled four, solvent accessible cysteine residues in the SecB tetramer and have investigated their relative spatial arrangement in the presence and absence of the substrate protein. The ESR data suggest that these cysteine residues are in close proximity when no substrate protein is bound, but move away from each other when SecB binds substrate. This is the first direct evidence of a conformational change in SecB upon binding of a substrate protein.
Chapter six discusses the mechanism of dissaggregation of a model peptide aggregate by chaperone SecB. The Hspl04, Hsp70 and Hsp40 chaperone system are capable of dissociating aggregated state(s) of substrate proteins, though little is known of the
mechanism of the process. The interaction of the B chain of insulin with chaperone SecB was investigated using light scattering, pyrene excimer fluorescence and electron spin resonance spectroscopy. We show that SecB prevents aggregation of the B chain of insulin. We show that SecB is capable of dissociating soluble B chain aggregate as monitored by pyrene fluorescence spectroscopy. The kinetics of dissociation of the B chain aggregate by SecB has also been investigated to understand the mechanism of dissociation. The data suggests that SecB does not act as a catalyst in dissociation of the aggregate to individual B chains, rather it binds the small population of free B chains with high affinity, thereby shifting the equilibrium from the ensemble of the aggregate towards the individual B chains. Thus SecB can rescue aggregated, partially folded /misfolded states of target proteins by a thermodynamic coupling mechanism when the free energy of binding to SecB is greater than the stability of the aggregate. Pyrene excimer fluorescence and ESR methods have been used to gain insights on the bound state conformation of the B chain to chaperone SecB. The data suggests that the B chain is bound to SecB in a flexible extended state in a hydrophobic cleft on SecB and that the binding site accommodates approximately 10 residues of substrate (9).
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IISc/oai:etd.ncsi.iisc.ernet.in:2005/242 |
| Date | 04 1900 |
| Creators | Panse, Vikram G |
| Contributors | Varadarajan, Raghavan |
| Publisher | Indian Institute of Science |
| Source Sets | India Institute of Science |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis and Dissertation |
| Format | 19193690 bytes, application/pdf |
| Rights | I grant Indian Institute of Science the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media, now hereafter known. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. |
Page generated in 0.0027 seconds