Abstract Elective urological patients’ medication usage at the time of admission Author: Nygren. J. Supervisor: Gillespie. U. Examiner: Nielsen. E. Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, division of pharmacokinetics and drug therapy. Faculty of pharmacy. Uppsala University, Sweden. Background and Objective: Information about the patient’s current medication treatment before elective urologic surgery has been based upon a prefilled self-reported health declaration or a patient provided medication list. A new work procedure has recently been adopted where a pharmacist performs a medication reconciliation in order to increase the patient safety, receive deeper insight into the patients ongoing treatment and to reduce the physician’s workload. The objective of the study was to map out how well the patients could account for their medication usage at the time of admission and to identify discrepancies between the health declaration/patient’s medication list and the medication list after medication reconciliation. Design: The study population consisted of adult men and women scheduled for elective urological surgery. A clinical pharmacist performed a medication reconciliation and stored appurtenant patient data and medication lists in anonymised forma. Data was then analysed by a student undertaking his degree project (MSc Clinical pharmacy). The population and discrepancies were divided into sub-groups and a t-test was performed to identify any statistical difference between selected sub-groups of the population. Setting: Urology department, Uppsala University Hospital Main outcome measures: The proportion of patients having at least one discrepancy were studied. Distribution of discrepancies per patient was compared between sub-groups; number of medications, age and county of residence. Results: At least one discrepancy (range 1-7) was observed in 51 (66%) out of the 77 patients included in the study. Patients using >5 medications at the time of admission had more discrepancies per patient than those using 0-5 medications (3.2 vs 1.0; p=5.6x10-6) and there was a trend towards Uppsala patients having more discrepancies per patient than those residing outside the region (2.4 vs 1.5; p=0.057). There was no significant difference observed between the age groups. Conclusion: The health declaration/medication list presented at the time of admission did not provide enough information to determine the patient’s complete medication usage.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:uu-418916 |
| Date | January 2020 |
| Creators | Nygren, Jonas |
| Publisher | Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för farmaceutisk biovetenskap |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | Swedish |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds