This thesis argues for a new theory of medical humanities practice and research, known as Mind Interface Theory. It begins with the claim that Sigmund Freud expanded medical metaphysics considerably in "A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis," and that this expansion affords the possibility of thinking of the mind as a user interface. Capitalizing on this affordance, the work then introduces mind interface theory as one possible imagining of Freud's metaphysical system, separate from his well-known theory, psychoanalysis. More specifically, it uses his discussion of dreamwork to reveal reprocessing as mind interface's mechanism of healing, before utilizing this reprocessing principle to orient the medical humanities' research, providing a theoretical framework for increased collaboration between humanists and physicians and a foundation for two distinct modes of activist scholarship: product-based and process-based. / Master of Arts / This thesis participates in medical humanities scholarship by advocating for a specific theory of the field that stems from a reading of Sigmund Freud’s Introduction to Psychoanalysis, a brief series of lectures which were written down for public consumption. Instead of using psychoanalysis itself to form a theory of the medical humanities, my work abstracts the broader suppositions on which psychoanalytic interpretation is rooted. This broader framework I call Freud’s medical metaphysics and define as the assumptions about causation and disease which form the basis for his philosophy of medical treatment. In making this distinction, I can more ably build my own theory of a mind interface on the fact that the basic structure of the metaphysics advocated in the lectures implies a vision of the mind that can be likened to a modern user interface. Through conceiving of the mind in terms of a user interface, I use mind interface theory to frame treatment in such a way as to promote a humanist theory of healing. The purport of the method is that humanists can assist patients through helping them utilize signs, language, and symbols to reprocess their experience. The advocation of this method is then applied to current threads in medical humanities scholarship to suggest that efforts in the field would be best served if they were directed towards studying the artifacts of patient populations for narrative and rhetorical strategies which were effective with coping with a specific illness and fostering an environment where patients are encouraged to produce such artifacts.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/101963 |
| Date | 29 July 2019 |
| Creators | Tiller, Samuel Perry |
| Contributors | English, Pender, Kelly E., Swenson, Karen, Commer, Carolyn |
| Publisher | Virginia Tech |
| Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | ETD, application/pdf, application/pdf |
| Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds