This study investigated effects of monitoring on correspondence between nonverbal responding and verbal descriptions of those contingencies, when verbal descriptions and contingencies were compatible and when incompatible. In the Nonverbal Component, the contingency for key pressing was either on a 0.8 s IRT or a 3.4 s IRT. In the Verbal Component, subjects made responses to a statement about the contingency for reinforcement in the Nonverbal Component. Shaping was used to establish targets of 0.8 s and 3.4 s in this component. Results indicated that across 7/8 opportunities subjects exhibited nonverbal and verbal behavior that was sensitive to their respective contingencies regardless of compatibility. This sensitivity to contingencies was not affected by the presence of a monitor.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc4226 |
| Date | 05 1900 |
| Creators | Crye, Amy Arthur |
| Contributors | Glenn, Sigrid S., 1939-, Ellis, Janet, Hyten, Cloyd |
| Publisher | University of North Texas |
| Source Sets | University of North Texas |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis or Dissertation |
| Format | Text |
| Rights | Public, Copyright, Crye, Amy Arthur, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds