The problems of judicial expertise in criminal proceedings Abstract Contemporary criminal proceedings are highly dependable on judicial expertise and in number of cases we encounter a situation where the determination of the facts is based on the expert evidence. However, judicial expertise is linked to a number of issues which damage the reputation of the field which is then considered to be untrustworthy by the general public. This paper is divided into 5 separate chapters dissecting the most commonly criticised practices by the general public. At first the issue of relegating responsibilities from the judge to the judicial experts is analysed. The author believes that there are two root causes to the problem, one being the factual accuracy of the provided expert evidence and the other being the unnecessary utilization of judicial experts. The aforementioned relegation of responsibilities places power in the hands of the experts whose work seldom meet the appropriate quality given the increased level of responsibility. Therefore the author further focuses on the problems with the quality of the expert evidence as well as examining the warranties provided by the current legislation and the shortcomings of this legislation along with the changes of it that are coming into effect as of 1 January 2021. The...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:411524 |
| Date | January 2020 |
| Creators | Kapounová, Jana |
| Contributors | Krupička, Jiří, Konrád, Zdeněk |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds