Return to search

The format effects of operating lease disclosures on the quality of decision-making by non-professional investors

The recent proposal by the Group of Four Plus One to modify the accounting
treatment of operating leases has attracted considerable comment. However, a review
of the publicly available submissions to this proposal reveals that no one has
addressed the issue in terms of the primary objective of general purpose financial
reports, that is, to provide decision useful information to non-professional investors.
This thesis seeks to redress this gap by providing some evidence of the ability of nonprofessional
investors to evaluate operating leases as they are presented according to
current accounting standards and alternative presentation formats.
The thesis reports the results of an experiment carried out on surrogates for nonprofessional
investors. The main finding is that the vast majority of subjects were
unable to evaluate operating lease information when it was disclosed in the notes,
rather than reported in the body of the Statement of Financial Position. Subjects
consistently relied on reported figures and seemed unable to incorporate information
presented in the notes to the financial reports, even when the links between the notes
and the reported figures were made more obvious than is currently the case.
The finding has a number of implications. It would appear that the existing accounting
treatment of operating leases is the source of a structural information asymmetry, as a
substantial proportion of users were unable to evaluate information relating to
operating leases. This information asymmetry should be removed for reasons of
economic efficiency. The recent withdrawal by non-professional investors from
equity markets shows that non-professional investors will react strongly if they start to
doubt the ability of general-purpose financial reports to provide them with decision
useful information.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:ADTP/218694
Date January 2003
CreatorsHughes, Mark, n/a
PublisherUniversity of Canberra. Law
Source SetsAustraliasian Digital Theses Program
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Rights), Copyright Mark Hughes

Page generated in 0.2215 seconds