Return to search

Genetic testing in the age of anxiety. From rhetoric to narrative.

The debate on genetic testing for Huntington???s disease has been dominated heavily by the bioethical and biomedical discourses. Yet upon analysis, both discourses are highly inadequate for understanding the complexity of the difficult choices people are faced with, and the inter-personal relations that are central to decisions regarding the uptake of genetic tests. The purpose of this thesis is two-fold. Firstly, to conduct a theoretically-informed critical analysis of the existing bioethical discourse on genetic testing for Huntington???s disease, that draws primarily on the work of contemporary feminist thinkers. Secondly, to explore how people with a genetic risk for Huntington???s disease negotiate the available choices between certainty and uncertainty; how they experience the liminality of ???being at risk??? in everyday life; how they manage their social environments; and how they interpret their own situation. The matter of ???choice??? is heightened because of the ready availability of genetic testing for Huntington???s disease, and the moral rhetoric that accompanies the provision of genetic services. Empirically, the research draws on the narratives by eleven people with a family history of Huntington???s disease, through which they discuss their fears of living in the shadow of the fatal disease, and consider their choices on reproduction and genetic testing. Their narratives will be analysed through the work of Foucault and Goffman, as well as a wide range of contemporary sociologists.The thesis being proposed is that decisions on genetic testing cannot be said to be ???individual???, but are instead dispersed among the social relations between the self and others, reflecting and transforming the values, competing desires, and the discourses that are prevalent in their social worlds. This is achieved through the discursive production of a web of narratives through which both individuals and institutions attempt to govern, with varying degrees of success, the implications of this relatively new field of knowledge.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:ADTP/242706
Date January 2005
CreatorsLeontini, Rose, School of Sociology, UNSW
PublisherAwarded by:University of New South Wales. School of Sociology
Source SetsAustraliasian Digital Theses Program
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
RightsCopyright Rose Leontini, http://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/copyright

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds