財務分析師大膽及領導特性與盈餘預測準確度之探討

本研究以I/B/E/S中2004至2005年所有美國公司為樣本,依財務分析師盈餘預測值與所有財務分析師盈餘預測平均值之差異程度,將財務分析師分類為大膽或膽怯的財務分析師,並依財務分析師盈餘預測發布之時點將財務分析師分類為領導型或從眾型財務分析師。針對財務分析師盈餘預測行為大膽及領導特性,探討時效性領導型財務分析師之盈餘預測是否會較大膽,並進一步研究大膽的財務分析師其盈餘預測準確度是否較高,以及時效性之領導型財務分析師其盈餘預測準確度是否較高。
研究結果發現時效性之領導型財務分析師其盈餘預測行為會較大膽,但大膽的財務分析師其盈餘預測準確度較低,且時效性之領導型財務分析師其盈餘預測準確度並未出現較高的現象。 / Security analysts can be characterized as bold or herding based on the absolute distance between their earnings forecasts and the consensus forecast. Security analysts can also be classified as lead or following based on the timeliness of their earnings forecasts. Based on I/B/E/S annual earnings forecasts of all American companies during the period of 2004-2005, this study addresses the association between bold and lead and the relation between bold forecast and forecast accuracy. In addition, the relation between lead forecast and forecast accuracy is investigated as well.
It is shown that lead analysts are bolder than following analysts and boldness likelihood increases with the frequency of analysts’ forecast and declines with the analysts’ prior accuracy. Further, bold analysts’ earnings forecasts are less accurate than herding analysts’ and lead analysts’ earnings forecasts are less accurate than following analysts.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0095353034
Creators林佳慧
Publisher國立政治大學
Source SetsNational Chengchi University Libraries
Language中文
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
RightsCopyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders

Page generated in 0.0024 seconds