Whatever the significance of the postmodern state of mind, recent views concerning philosophical eclecticism are largely the product of researches into the history of philosophy. There is an obvious inclination of today''s intellectual historians to investigate background figures of European modernity. The increasing willingness of historians to enlarge the notion of philosophy in both its disciplinary and historical definition seems to be in agreement with a similar disposition of contemporary philosophers. As we can learn from Michael Albrecht''s and Patrice Vermeren''s books, a critical appreciation of eclecticism throws light both on the conditions of contemporary philosophizing and on the politics of philosophy in the modern age.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:13180 |
| Date | 24 February 2015 |
| Creators | Schneider, Ulrich Johannes |
| Publisher | Johns Hopkins Univ. Press |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, doc-type:article, info:eu-repo/semantics/article, doc-type:Text |
| Source | Journal of the history of ideas, 59 (1998),1, S. 173 - 182 ISSN 0022-5037 |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa2-776112, qucosa:77611 |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds