Return to search

Comparing self-report measures of internalized weight stigma: the weight self-stigma questionnaire versus the weight bias internalization scale

Background: Internalized weight stigma has gained growing interest due to its association with multiple health impairments in individuals with obesity. Especially high internalized weight stigma is reported by individuals undergoing bariatric surgery. For assessing this concept, two different self-report questionnaires are available, but have never been compared: the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) and the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS). The purpose of the present study was to provide and to compare reliability, convergent validity with and predictive values for psychosocial health outcomes for the WSSQ and WBIS. Methods: The WSSQ and the WBIS were used to assess internalized weight stigma in N = 78 prebariatric surgery patients. Further, body mass index (BMI) was assessed and body image, quality of life, self-esteem, depression, and anxiety were measured by well-established self-report questionnaires. Reliability, correlation, and regression analyses were conducted. Results: Internal consistency of the WSSQ was acceptable, while good internal consistency was found for the WBIS. Both measures were significantly correlated with each other and body image. While only the WSSQ was correlated with overweight preoccupation, only the WBIS was correlated with appearance evaluation. Both measures were not associated with BMI. However, correlation coefficients did not differ between the WSSQ and the WBIS for all associations with validity measures. Further, both measures significantly predicted quality of life, self-esteem, depression, and anxiety, while the WBIS explained significantly more variance than the WSSQ total score for self-esteem.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:15179
Date January 2016
CreatorsHübner, Claudia, Schmidt, Ricarda, Selle, Janine, Köhler, Hinrich, Müller, Astrid, de Zwaan, Martin, Hilbert, Anja
ContributorsUniversität Leipzig, Medizinische Hochschule, Herzogin-Elisabeth-Hospital
PublisherPublic Library of Science
Source SetsHochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typedoc-type:article, info:eu-repo/semantics/article, doc-type:Text
SourcePLoS ONE 11(10): e0165566. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0165566
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.1008 seconds