Produced water is the largest waste product by volume in the oil industry and its treatment in onshore or offshore fields poses bigger and different challenges than what water engineers are used to encounter. Process to achieve reuse quality of this water is very expensive with many technical hurdles to overcome making the optimization of the treatment steps necessary.
Electrocoagulation (EC) generates coagulants in-situ responsible for destabilizing oil droplets, suspended particles, and common pollutant in produced water. Furthermore, EC is a very efficient technology compared with traditional primary treatments used in the oil & gas industry and has several advantages such as: no hazardous chemical handling (which diminishes the risk of accident and logistic costs), high efficiency potential concerning boron removal, potential small footprint and less sludge generation.
In this research, the treatment of produced water using EC was investigated in a practical manner for the oilfield to aim for a cleaner effluent for further processing and help to achieve a reuse quality. For this, an EC cell was designed using different parameters normally used in the literature to fit this scenario. After preliminary tests, the treatment time was set to 3 seconds. Response surface method (RSM) was employed to optimize the operating conditions for TOC removal on a broad quality of synthetic produced water while varying: salinity, initial oil concentration and initial pH. TOC was chosen to be the main response because of its importance in legislation and sensibility on the method.
Furthermore, turbidity removal, change of pH value after EC in water with lack of buffer capacity, aluminum concentration and preliminary tests involving boron removal and influence of hydrogen carbonate were also studied. Real produced water was treated with EC to assess the optimum conditions obtained by the RSM showing the results were closely related. Finally, an estimation of volume required and operating cost for EC in the different types of produced water was made to assess how realistic it is for onshore and offshore applications.:ERKLÄRUNG DES PROMOVENDEN I
ACKNOLEDGEMENT III
ABSTRACT V
TABLE OF CONTENT VII
LIST OF FIGURES IX
LIST OF TABLES X
LIST OF EQUATIONS XII
ABBREVIATIONS XIV
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. PRODUCED WATER 6
2.1 Characterization of Oilfield Produced Water 6
2.2 Produced Water Management 10
2.2.1 Discharge and Regulations 10
2.2.2 Efforts on Reuse 11
2.2.3 Cost 14
3. PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT 17
3.1 Most Common Primary Treatment 17
3.1.1 Hydrocyclones 17
3.1.2 Flotation unit 18
3.2 Further Water Treatment Technologies 19
3.2.1 Membrane Process 19
3.2.1.1 Microfiltration 19
3.2.1.2 Ultrafiltration 21
3.2.1.3 Nanofiltration 23
3.2.1.4 Reverse Osmosis 24
3.2.1.5 Forward osmosis 24
3.2.2 Electrodialysis 25
3.2.3 Biological treatment 28
3.2.3.1 Aerobic and anaerobic process 28
3.2.3.2 Combining membrane and bio-reactor 29
3.2.4 Oxidative process 30
3.2.4.1 Oxidation process 30
3.2.4.2 Anodic oxidation 32
3.2.5 Thermal technology 34
3.2.5.1 Evaporation 34
3.2.5.2 Eutectic freeze crystallization 35
3.2.6 Adsorption and ion-exchange 36
3.3 Electrocoagulation 39
3.3.1 Colloidal Stability Theory 39
3.3.2 Theory of Electrocoagulation 40
3.3.3 Mechanism of Abatement of Impurities 44
3.3.4 Operational parameters and efficiency 49
4. MATERIALS AND METHODS 51
4.1 Analytical Techniques and Synthetic Solutions 51
4.1.1 Analytical Techniques 51
4.1.2 Synthetic Produced Water 51
4.2 Design of Experiment and Models 54
4.3 Experimental Protocol for EC 56 4
.4 Development of the new Electrocoagulation cell 57
4.5 Real Produced water 58
5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 59
5.1 Designing EC Cell Process 59
5.1.1 Computational Fluid Dynamics for EC manufacturing 59
5.2 Preliminary Experiments 61
5.2.1 TOC Removal and Residence Time Determination 61
5.2.2 Aluminum Concentration 64
5.3 Models Quality and Range of Validity 66
5.3.1 TOC Removal 66
5.3.2 Turbidity Removal 69
5.3.3 Final pH value 71
5.3.4 Ionic Strength and Interpolation for Different Salinities 73
5.3.5 Partial Conclusions 76
5.4 Evolution of the Final pH Value 78
5.5 Operation Region for Effective Treatment of Produced Water with EC 80
5.5.1 Produced Water with Low Salinity 80
Organic Compounds Removal 80
Turbidity Removal 83
5.5.2 Produced Water with Medium Salinity 84 Organic Compounds Removal 84
Turbidity Removal 86
5.5.3 Produced Water with High Salinity 87
Organic Compounds Removal 87
5.6 Influence of Hydrogen Carbonate 90
5.7 Real Produced water 91
5.8 Boron Removal 93
5.9 Estimation of the Size for EC in Full scale 94
5.10 Produced Water with Very Low Salinity and EC 95
5.11 Estimation of Operation Cost 96
6. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 98
6.1 Conclusion 98
6.2 Recommendations for Future Work 101
Scale up on EC for upstream 101
Further processing and reuse 101
Online optimization for EC 101
Recommendations for any research related to upstream produced water 101
BIBLIOGRAPHY 102
APPENDIX A 117
APPENDIX B 120
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:35508 |
| Date | 27 September 2019 |
| Creators | de Farias Lima, Flávia |
| Contributors | Krebs, Peter, Stolte, Stefan, Malayeri, Reza Mohammad, Technische Universität Dresden |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | doc-type:doctoralThesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis, doc-type:Text |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0092 seconds