Return to search

Restri??o alimentar quantitativa para frangos de corte. / Quantitative feed restriction to broiler chicken

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T14:59:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2007-Kely Cristina Bastos Teixeira Ramos.pdf: 271950 bytes, checksum: 614e6c37ea26196b362bfddfc370f7a2 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2007-08-24 / The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the different quantitative feed
restriction programs on the productive performance, carcass characteristics, chemical
composition of noble cuts and economic viability. Two hundred and sixty four male broiler
chickens from the Cobb Avian 48 commercial strain were used. The performance essay took
place from 8th to 42th day of age. The birds were distributed in six treatments with four
replicates and ten birds per experimental unit. The experimental design was the completely
randomized. The feed restriction programs were: T1 ad libitum; T2- feed restriction at 8th
day of age; T3- feed restriction at 8th and 13th days of age; T4- feed restriction at 8th, 13th and
18th days of age; T5- feed restriction at 8th, 13th, 18th and 23th days of age; T6- feed restriction
at 8th, 13th, 18th, 23th and 28th days of age. Each feed restriction consisted in the withdrawal of
the feed for 24 hours. In the end of performance test, two broilers per experimental unit with
group representative average weight totalizing forty eight animals were taken to the
evaluation of yield, carcass characteristics and chemical composition of noble cuts.
Evaluating the total period from 8-42 days of age, the feed restriction program did not
influence the feed intake, feed:gain ratio and weight gain of analyzed birds. To the carcass
characteristics, was observed that absolute weight and the carcass, thigh, upper thigh and back
yields were not influenced by the studied feed restriction programs such as the relative
weights of heart, liver, gizzard and intestine. Nevertheless, breast weight was negatively
influenced by the severe restriction programs (T4, T5 and T6). The relative weight of
abdominal was superior in the carcasses of T6 in relation to the T1. Thigh and upper thigh
crude protein an ether extract contents were influenced by the feed restriction, but without a
defined tendency. About the economical indicators, the broilers that were not submitted to the
restriction (T1) presented greater average gross income (AGI) and relative profitability index
(RPI) while the treatment submitted to the more intense restriction (T6) resulted in worst AGI
and RPI values. Considering the results of carcass characteristics and economical indicators
parameters presented in this study, no reasons were found to justify the adoption of feed
restriction programs in male broiler chickens from Cobb strain. / O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os efeitos dos diferentes programas de restri??o alimentar
quantitativa no desempenho produtivo, caracter?sticas da carca?a, composi??o qu?mica dos
corte nobres e viabilidade econ?mica. Foram utilizados duzentos e sessenta e quatro frangos
de corte machos da linhagem comercial Cobb Avian 48. O ensaio de desempenho ocorreu do
8? ao 42? dia de idade. As aves foram distribu?das aleatoriamente em seis tratamentos com
quatro repeti??es e dez aves por unidade experimental. O delineamento experimental utilizado
foi o inteiramente casualizado. Os programas de restri??o alimentar foram: T1 ra??o ?
vontade; T2 restri??o alimentar no 8? dia de idade; T3 restri??o alimentar no 8? e 13? dias
de idade; T4 restri??o alimentar no 8? 13? e 18? dias de idade; T5 restri??o alimentar no 8?,
13?, 18? e 23? dias de idade; T6 restri??o alimentar no 8?, 13?, 18?, 23? e 28? dias de idade.
Cada restri??o alimentar consistiu na retirada total da ra??o por 24 horas. Ao final do ensaio
de desempenho, foram retirados dois frangos por unidade experimental com peso m?dio
representativo do grupo, totalizando 48 animais, para avalia??o das caracter?sticas da carca?a
e composi??o qu?mica dos cortes nobres. Avaliando o per?odo total de 8-42 dias de idade os
programas de restri??o alimentar n?o influenciaram o consumo de ra??o, a convers?o
alimentar e o ganho de peso das aves analisadas. Quanto ?s caracter?sticas de carca?a,
observou-se que os pesos absolutos e os rendimentos da carca?a, coxa, sobrecoxa e dorso n?o
foram influenciados pelos programas de restri??o alimentar estudados, assim como os pesos
relativos do cora??o, f?gado, moela e intestinos. No entanto, o peso do peito foi influenciado
negativamente pelos programas de restri??o mais severos (T4, T5 e T6). O peso relativo da
gordura abdominal foi superior nas carca?as do T6 em rela??o ao T1. Os teores de prote?na
bruta e extrato et?reo da coxa e da sobrecoxa foram influenciados pela restri??o alimentar,
mas sem uma tend?ncia definida. Em rela??o aos indicadores econ?micos, os frangos que n?o
foram submetidos ? restri??o (T1) apresentaram maior renda bruta m?dia (RBM) e ?ndice
relativo de rentabilidade (IRR), enquanto que o tratamento submetido ? restri??o mais severa
(T6) resultou em piores valores para RBM e IRR. Considerando-se os resultados para os
par?metros de caracter?sticas de carca?a e indicadores econ?micos apresentados no presente
estudo, n?o foram encontradas raz?es que justifiquem a ado??o de programas de restri??o
alimentar em frangos de corte machos da linhagem Cobb.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:localhost:tede/569
Date24 August 2007
CreatorsRamos, Kely Cristina Bastos Teixeira
ContributorsGomes, Augusto Vidal da Costa, Curvello, Fernando Augusto
PublisherUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Curso de P?s-Gradua??o em Zootecnia, UFRRJ, Brasil, Produ??o Animal
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcereponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ, instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, instacron:UFRRJ
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.002 seconds