Return to search

An?lise de conte?do e valida??o cl?nica do diagn?stico de enfermagem autocontrole ineficaz da sa?de

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-06-23T21:17:23Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
MariaDasGracasMarianoNunesDePaiva_DISSERT.pdf: 1617534 bytes, checksum: bdf20a4c5dfbaa77ee6485f3f947ad4d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-06-28T20:12:19Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
MariaDasGracasMarianoNunesDePaiva_DISSERT.pdf: 1617534 bytes, checksum: bdf20a4c5dfbaa77ee6485f3f947ad4d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-28T20:12:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
MariaDasGracasMarianoNunesDePaiva_DISSERT.pdf: 1617534 bytes, checksum: bdf20a4c5dfbaa77ee6485f3f947ad4d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-11-24 / O objetivo do estudo ? analisar o conte?do e as medidas de acur?cia do diagn?stico de enfermagem Autocontrole Ineficaz da Sa?de em pacientes submetidos ? hemodi?lise. Estudo do tipo metodol?gico, desenvolvido em duas etapas, a saber: an?lise de conte?do por ju?zes e acur?cia dos indicadores cl?nicos. Na primeira etapa, 22 ju?zes avaliaram a defini??o e localiza??o do diagn?stico, indicadores cl?nicos e fatores etiol?gicos e suas defini??es conceituais e emp?ricas. Utilizou-se o teste binomial para avaliar a concord?ncia entre os ju?zes. Na segunda etapa, utilizou-se o modelo de classe latente para a infer?ncia diagn?stica. Pesquisa aprovada pelo Comit? de ?tica, sob o Parecer no 387.837 e CAAE 18486413.0.0000.5537. Os resultados mostram que os ju?zes avaliaram como pertinentes 12 indicadores cl?nicos e 22 fatores etiol?gicos. Propuseram altera??o da nomenclatura de cinco indicadores cl?nicos e seis fatores etiol?gicos e a transposi??o de um indicador cl?nico para fator etiol?gico e tr?s fatores etiol?gicos para indicadores cl?nicos. Nas defini??es conceituais e emp?ricas, os ju?zes julgaram como n?o pertinentes as defini??es conceitual e emp?rica de um indicador cl?nico e defini??es conceituais de dois fatores etiol?gicos e defini??es emp?ricas de quatro fatores etiol?gicos. Ainda, foram sugeridas altera??es nas defini??es conceitual e emp?rica de dois indicadores cl?nicos, nas defini??es conceituais de 12 fatores etiol?gicos e em defini??es emp?ricas de 11 fatores etiol?gicos. Os indicadores cl?nicos analisados na primeira etapa foram validados clinicamente em pacientes submetidos ? hemodi?lise. Os indicadores cl?nicos mais frequentes foram Altera??es de exames laboratoriais (100%) e Escolhas de vida di?ria ineficazes para atingir metas de sa?de (81%) e, tr?s fatores etiol?gicos apresentaram maior frequ?ncia, s?o eles: Fatores sociodemogr?ficos desfavor?veis (94,5%), Cren?as (79%) e Comorbidades (77,5%). A partir do Modelo de Classe Latente, foi estimada a preval?ncia do diagn?stico em 66,28%. Os indicadores cl?nicos que apresentaram as melhores medidas de acur?cia para a sensibilidade do diagn?stico de enfermagem Autocontrole Ineficaz da Sa?de foram: Escolhas de vida di?ria ineficazes para atingir metas de sa?de e Express?o de dificuldade com os regimes prescritos. Por sua vez, os indicadores cl?nicos Uso inadequado de medicamentos, N?o Express?o de desejo de controlar a doen?a, Comparecimento irregular ?s sess?es de di?lise e Infec??o foram mais espec?ficos quanto ao referido diagn?stico. N?o ades?o ao tratamento foi o ?nico indicador que apresentou intervalos de confian?a com signific?ncia para sensibilidade e especificidade. Deste modo, o indicador cl?nico N?o ades?o ao tratamento ? mais preciso e fidedigno quanto ? infer?ncia do diagn?stico de enfermagem Autocontrole Ineficaz da Sa?de na clientela hemodial?tica. Assim, acredita-se que o aprimoramento dos componentes do diagn?stico de enfermagem em quest?o, ir? contribuir para a elabora??o de interven??es de enfermagem mais fidedignas ao estado de sa?de do indiv?duo em hemodi?lise, proporcionando um cuidado mais qualificado cientificamente. / The study aims to analyze the content and measures of accuracy of the nursing diagnosis Ineffective Self Health in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Study of nursing diagnosis validation carried out in two stages, namely: content analysis by judges and accuracy of clinical indicators. In the first stage, 22 judges evaluated the setting and location of the diagnosis, clinical indicators and etiological factors and their conceptual and empirical definitions. We used the binomial test to determine the proportion of the judges of the relevance of the components of the nursing diagnosis. In the second stage, we used the Latent Class Analysis for the diagnostic accuracy by evaluating 200 patients in a hemodialysis clinic in northeastern Brazil. Research approved by the Ethics Committee, under the Opinion No 387 837 and CAAE 18486413.0.0000.5537. The results show that the judges evaluated as pertinent clinical indicators 12 and 22 etiological factors. Proposed amendment of the nomenclature of five indicators and six factors and the implementation of a clinical indicator for etiology and three etiological factors for clinical indicators. In conceptual and empirical definitions, judges judged as not relevant the conceptual and empirical definitions of a clinical indicator, the conceptual definitions of two etiological factors and empirical definitions four etiological factors. Still, changes were suggested in the conceptual and empirical definitions of two clinical indicators, the conceptual definitions of 12 etiological factors and empirical definitions of 11 etiological factors. Clinical indicators analyzed in the first stage were validated clinically in patients undergoing hemodialysis. The most frequent clinical indicators were Changes in laboratory tests (100%) and daily life choices ineffective to achieve health goals (81%); and three etiological factors had a higher frequency, they are: unfavorable demographic factors (94.5%), beliefs (79%) and comorbidities (77.5%). From Latent class analysis, diagnosis prevalence was estimated at 66.28%. Clinical indicators that showed the best sensitivity measures for the nursing diagnosis Ineffective Self Health were: daily life choices ineffective to achieve health goals and Expression of difficulty with prescribed regimens. In turn, the clinical indicators of inappropriate medication use, no expression of desire to control the disease, irregular attendance to the dialysis sessions and infection were more specific as to that diagnosis. Non-adherence to treatment was the only indicator that showed
confidence intervals with values for sensitivity and specificity, statistically above 0.5, being the one who has better diagnostic accuracy as the inference of the nursing diagnosis Ineffective Self Health in hemodialysis clientele. Thus, it is believed that the improvement of the components of diagnosis in question will contribute to the development of more reliable nursing interventions to the health status of the individual in hemodialysis, providing a more scientifically qualified care.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/20808
Date24 November 2015
CreatorsPaiva, Maria das Gra?as Mariano Nunes de
Contributors64194892372, http://lattes.cnpq.br/4545130167501174, Feij?o, Alexsandra Rodrigues, 70495742368, http://lattes.cnpq.br/8649283681727209, Enders, Bertha Cruz, 25444816415, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7658846319631166, Lopes, Marcos Ven?cios de Oliveira, 67729410397, http://lattes.cnpq.br/9321075005010548, Lira, Ana Luisa Brand?o de Carvalho
PublisherUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ENFERMAGEM, UFRN, Brasil
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0026 seconds