Return to search

Democracia deliberativa: a opini?o p?blica e o Amicus Curiae na ?tica da jurisdi??o procedimental

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2018-02-15T11:42:47Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
CarlosAndreMacielPinheiroPereira_DISSERT.pdf: 1299607 bytes, checksum: a9e15627491aa83891cdd91ec4124ef5 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2018-02-16T13:24:41Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
CarlosAndreMacielPinheiroPereira_DISSERT.pdf: 1299607 bytes, checksum: a9e15627491aa83891cdd91ec4124ef5 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-02-16T13:24:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
CarlosAndreMacielPinheiroPereira_DISSERT.pdf: 1299607 bytes, checksum: a9e15627491aa83891cdd91ec4124ef5 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-12-07 / A presente disserta??o tem como objetivo analisar a conex?o entre a opini?o p?blica constru?da procedimentalmente, atrav?s do discurso, com a legitimidade e racionalidade da jurisdi??o constitucional. O exame ? feito com m?todo dedutivo, atrav?s de pesquisa qualitativa e vi?s normativo, com apoio bibliogr?fico na obra de J?rgen Habermas, tendo na teoria do agir comunicativo um ponto de partida. No decorrer do estudo s?o feitas considera??es sobre a forma??o da opini?o p?blica no contexto da democracia deliberativa e os seus reflexos na judicatura, tendo no instituto do amicus curiae um canal comunicativo entre sociedade civil e poder judici?rio. Compreende, ainda, que a jurisdi??o tem sua legitimidade condicionada a um modelo procedimental, cuja viga mestra ? a coopera??o dial?gica entre todos os atores processuais envolvidos, sendo esta uma das t?nicas adotadas pelo C?digo de Processo Civil. Ao fim, conclui que o modelo procedimental baseado em J?rgen Habermas ? aplic?vel ao Brasil. / This dissertation aims to analyze the connection between procedurally constructed public opinion, through discourse, with the legitimacy and rationality of constitutional jurisdiction. The study is carried from a deductive method, through qualitative research and normative bias, and bibliographical support on the work of J?rgen Habermas, being the theory of communicative action the starting point. In the course of the study, considerations about the formation of public opinion in the context of deliberative democracy and its reflexes in judicature, being amicus curiae the communicative channel between civil society and the judiciary branch. Comprehends, moreover, that jurisdiction has its legitimacy conditioned to a procedural model, whose crossbeam is the dialogical cooperation between all procedural actors involved, being this one of the tones adopted by the Civil Procedural Law. In the end, it is concluded that the procedural model based in J?rgen Habermas is applied in Brazil.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/24736
Date07 December 2017
CreatorsPereira, Carlos Andr? Maciel Pinheiro
Contributors09610294553, Capistrano, Pablo Moreno Paiva, 78600936420, Goes, Ricardo Tinoco de, 46636528400, Ros?rio, Jos? Orlando Ribeiro
PublisherPROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM DIREITO, UFRN, Brasil
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds