Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:39:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
456796.pdf: 2189221 bytes, checksum: f8e9600fe7fa43a3874fb191f6940a3a (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-02-27 / This study is guided by two questions: What is autofiction? What is the relationship between autofiction and contemporary Brazilian literature? Since the neologism was created by the French professor and writer Serge Doubrovsky, the concept of autofiction has been widely discussed in theoretical and literary studies, especially in France and in the French Canada. In order to discuss the original definition of autofiction (originally created in 1977) and the will of its creator to continue dictating what may or may not be considered autofiction this study presents a survey of the controversial debate around the subject and reflects on its updates as well as the multiplicity of the current autoficcional Brazilian literature. With this research, we intended to expand the existing debate and contribute to the theoretical and literary studies related to autofiction in Brazil, providing not only theoretical reflections in Portuguese, but also thinking about Brazilian literature. Our hypothesis is that autofiction is a new literary genre, still in process of being established. Therefore, it has been the focus of confusing and contradictory discussions, rejection and fascination. Thinking on autofictions in a plural form allow us to rethink the notion of a tight literary genre, making room for the different currents of this literary practice. We also propose the neologism alterfiction to designate a practice very close to autofiction, a "little sister" of the incipient genre, based on the concept of alterbiography proposed by Ana Maria Bulh?es-Carvalho. / Este estudo ? norteado por duas quest?es: O que ? autofic??o? Qual a rela??o entre a autofic??o e a literatura brasileira contempor?nea? Desde que o neologismo foi criado pelo professor e escritor franc?s Serge Doubrovsky, o conceito de autofic??o tem sido amplamente discutido nos estudos te?rico-liter?rios, sobretudo na Fran?a e no Canad? franc?s. A fim de problematizar a defini??o original de autofic??o (realizada nos anos 1977) e a vontade de seu criador (Doubrovsky) em continuar ditando o que pode ser ou n?o considerado autofic??o, realizamos o levantamento do debate pol?mico existente em torno do tema e refletimos sobre as atualiza??es desse conceito, assim como a multiplicidade do exerc?cio autoficcional na atual literatura brasileira. Quisemos, com essa pesquisa, ampliar o debate j? existente, problematiz?-lo e contribuir para os estudos te?ricos e liter?rios sobre a autofic??o j? existentes no Brasil, disponibilizando as reflex?es te?ricas em l?ngua portuguesa e pensando sobre a literatura brasileira. A nossa hip?tese ? a de que a autofic??o ? um novo g?nero liter?rio, ainda em processo de estabelecimento, e, por isso, tem sido foco de discuss?es confusas e contradit?rias, de rejei??o e de fascina??o. Falar em autofic??es, no plural, nos permite repensar a no??o de um g?nero liter?rio tido como estanque, abrindo espa?o para os diferentes perfis dessa pr?tica liter?ria. Tamb?m propomos o neologismo alterfic??o para designar uma pr?tica muito pr?xima ? autofic??o, uma irm? mais nova do g?nero incipiente, tendo por base o conceito de alterbiografia proposto por Ana Maria Bulh?es-Carvalho.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/2148 |
| Date | 27 February 2014 |
| Creators | Martins, Anna Faedrich |
| Contributors | Mello, Ana Maria Lisboa de |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Letras, PUCRS, BR, Faculdade de Letras |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 8447345070736321569, 500, 600, -2856882280194242995 |
Page generated in 0.0221 seconds