Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-02T13:54:54Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTA??O - ?TALO DA SILVA ALVES.pdf: 922926 bytes, checksum: 37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504be (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-02T14:16:19Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTA??O - ?TALO DA SILVA ALVES.pdf: 922926 bytes, checksum: 37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504be (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-02T14:18:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTA??O - ?TALO DA SILVA ALVES.pdf: 922926 bytes, checksum: 37b72dc5a9648c006567e23bf7c504be (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-03-05 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPq / In this work, I ask what is the normative capacity of dissensus in a theory of social normativity. I investigate the fundamental elements of a deliberative theory of social normativity set forth by J?rgen Habermas and argue that, in a project of deliberative normative justification, not only consensus but also dissensus has normative capacity. I present a minimal formulation of Habermas? normative project, which encompasses the concepts of discourse, consensus and public sphere, and then proceed to distinguish three different realms in a deliberative theory of social normativity ? politics, the political, and the dispute for politicity ? approaching the nature and the role of dissensus in each one. I argue that (a) politics is a realm of the institutions of liberal democracy, where dissensus takes the form of conflict among groups and models of public spheres, having the role of keeping the public sphere multiple and inclusive; (b) the political is the realm of interaction of discourses about the imperative of human coexistence in the world, where dissensus takes the form of adversariness and has the role of maintaining the disagreement necessary for pluralism; and (c) the dispute for politicity is the pre-discursive realm where struggles for the capacity to issue political claims take place, where dissensus has the role of pointing out the unjustified partiality of the discursive genre as the only one capable of conveying social interactions with normative potential. / Neste trabalho, questiono qual ? a capacidade normativa do dissenso em uma teoria da normatividade social. Para tanto, investigo os elementos fundamentais de uma teoria deliberativa da normatividade social estabelecidos por J?rgen Habermas e sustento que, em um projeto deliberativo de justifica??o normativa, n?o apenas o consenso, mas tamb?m o dissenso possui capacidade normativa. Apresento uma formula??o m?nima do projeto normativo de Habermas, que envolve os conceitos de discurso, consenso e esfera p?blica, e fa?o uma distin??o entre tr?s ?mbitos diferentes presentes em uma teoria deliberativa da normatividade social ? a pol?tica, o pol?tico e a disputa pela politicidade ?, abordando a natureza e o papel do dissenso em cada um deles. Defendo que (a) a pol?tica ? um ?mbito das institui??es da democracia liberal, onde o dissenso toma a forma de conflito entre grupos e modelos de esferas p?blicas e tem o papel de manter a esfera p?blica m?ltipla e inclusiva; (b) o pol?tico ? o ?mbito da intera??o de discursos sobre o imperativo da coexist?ncia humana no mundo, onde o dissenso toma a forma de adversariedade e tem o papel de manter o desacordo necess?rio ao pluralismo; e (c) a disputa pela politicidade ? o ?mbito pr?-discursivo onde t?m lugar as reivindica??es pela capacidade de emitir demandas normativas, onde o dissenso tem o papel de apontar a parcialidade injustificada do g?nero discursivo como ?nico capaz de comportar intera??es sociais com potencial normativo.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7972 |
| Date | 05 March 2018 |
| Creators | Alves, ?talo da Silva |
| Contributors | Weber, Thadeu |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Humanidades |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -8305327606432166393, 500, 500, 500, 600, -6557531471218110192, -672352020940167053, -2555911436985713659 |
Page generated in 0.003 seconds