Submitted by PPG Odontologia (odontologia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-03-15T15:35:44Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
P?MELLA_TOMAZI_GODOY_DE_OLIVEIRA_DIS.pdf: 1304084 bytes, checksum: caf3b44234731105c91e07d645c0f956 (MD5) / Rejected by Tatiana Lopes (tatiana.lopes@pucrs.br), reason: Devolvido porque o sum?rio do pdf est? desconfigurado. on 2018-03-28T11:41:16Z (GMT) / Submitted by PPG Odontologia (odontologia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-25T13:25:14Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
P?MELLA_TOMAZI_GODOY_DE_OLIVEIRA_DIS.pdf: 1304084 bytes, checksum: caf3b44234731105c91e07d645c0f956 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-06-11T16:26:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
P?MELLA_TOMAZI_GODOY_DE_OLIVEIRA_DIS.pdf: 1304084 bytes, checksum: caf3b44234731105c91e07d645c0f956 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-06-11T16:31:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
P?MELLA_TOMAZI_GODOY_DE_OLIVEIRA_DIS.pdf: 1304084 bytes, checksum: caf3b44234731105c91e07d645c0f956 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-01-25 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPq / Aims: to evaluate in vitro the fracture strength and failure pattern of endocrown restorations performed with Incoris TZI ceramics, Celta Duo and Empress CAD cemented on endodontically treated molars. Materials and methods: forty extracted sound molars were randomly distributed into 4 groups (n = 10). After being endodontically treated, they were restored with endocrowns carried out through the CEREC system with three different materials: Empress CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent), Celta Duo (Dentsply/Sirona) or Incoris TZI (Dentsply/Sirona). After, they were subjected to mechanical fatigue testing with vertical load application of 200N, totalling 500,000 cycles. Subsequently, the samples were submitted to the maximum fracture load under compressive force on the long axis of the tooth at cross-head speed of 1mm/min.. After the fracture strength testing the fracture patterns were evaluated being classified as repairable (cusps) or irreparable (pulp chamber floor rupture).
Results: Sound: 4306Na ? 716.5; Incoris TZI: 3770NAb ? 846; Empress CAD: 1994Nc ? 498.5; Celta Duo: 3298Nb ? 1121. The Incoris TZI and Celta Duo presented the same proportion of irreparable fractures, 60%. The Empress Cad presented the same proportion for the repairable and irreparable fractures (50%). Conclusion: The Incoris TZI presented higher fracture strength, followed by Celta Duo, but did not differ statistically. In turn, the Empress CAD differed statistically from the others presenting lower fracture strength. The Incoris TZI and Celta Duo presented the same prognosis of failures with predominance of irreparable failures. / Objetivos: avaliar in vitro a resist?ncia ? fratura e o padr?o de falha de restaura??es endocrown realizadas com as cer?micas inCoris TZI, Celtra Duo e Empress CAD cimentadas sobre molares tratados endodonticamente. Materiais e m?todos: quarenta dentes molares h?gidos extra?dos foram distribu?dos aleatoriamente em 4 grupos (n=10). Ap?s serem endodonticamente tratados, foram restaurados com endocrowns realizadas atrav?s do sistema CEREC/InLab (Sirona) com tr?s diferentes materiais: Empress CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent), Celtra Duo (Dentsply/Sirona) ou inCoris TZI (Dentsply/Sirona). Ap?s, foram submetidos ? fadiga mec?nica com aplica??o de carga vertical de 200N, totalizando 500.000 ciclos. Posteriormente, foi testada a carga m?xima de fratura com for?a compressiva no longo eixo do dente sob velocidade de 1mm/min.. Ap?s o ensaio foram avaliados os padr?es de fratura e classificados em repar?veis (c?spides) ou irrepar?veis (assoalho da c?mara pulpar).
Resultados: H?gidos: 4306Na ? 716,5; inCoris TZI: 3770Nab ? 846; Empress CAD:1994Nc ? 498,5; Celtra Duo: 3298Nb ? 1121. O grupo inCoris TZI e Celtra Duo apresentaram a mesma propor??o de fraturas irrepar?veis, 60%. O grupo Empress Cad apresentou a mesma propor??o para as fraturas repar?veis e irrepar?veis (50%). Conclus?o: O grupo inCoris TZI apresentou maior resist?ncia ? fratura, seguido do grupo Celtra Duo, mas n?o diferiram estatisticamente. Por sua vez, a cer?mica Empress CAD diferiu estatisticamente das demais apresentando menor valor de resist?ncia ? fratura. O grupo Incoris TZI e Celtra Duo apresentaram o mesmo progn?stico de falhas com predomin?ncia de falhas irrepar?veis.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8119 |
| Date | 25 January 2018 |
| Creators | Oliveira, P?mella Tomazi Godoy de |
| Contributors | Burnett Junior, Luiz Henrique |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Odontologia, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Ci?ncias da Sa?de |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -8096554818733665164, 500, 500, 600, -2070498469879244349, -2555911436985713659 |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds