Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Malpractice litigation is on the increase and a lack of informed consent is more frequently becoming primary
and secondary causes of action. A study was designed to compare and analyze the viewpoints of Indiana pediatric
dentists and trial attorneys concerning the doctrine of informed consent. The ultimate goal was to share the information with both groups and raise the level of awareness of the doctrine among pediatric dentists. A three-page questionnaire dealing with the doctrine
of informed consent was mailed to 85 pediatric dentists and 350 trial attorneys practicing in Indiana. The response rate for pediatric dentists was 70.6 percent and the response rate for trial attorneys was 61.4 percent.
Overall, most pediatric dentists and trial attorneys were moderately familiar with the doctrine of informed consent. However, trial attorneys do not feel that pediatric dentists conform to the doctrine, while pediatric dentists perceive that they do conform. Pediatric dentists and trial attorneys recommend that informed consent be obtained orally and then documented on an informed consent form. Both professional groups agree that obtaining informed consent is necessary in the practice of pediatric
dentistry. Unfortunately, pediatric dentists and trial attorneys do not f eel that predoctoral dental school education or specialty training prepares the pediatric dentist to obtain an informed consent. Not surprisingly, both groups feel that pediatric dentists are more concerned with obtaining informed consent today than they were in the past. Most pediatric dentists are obtaining informed consent in less than five minutes. However, pediatric dentists feel that the time spent obtaining informed consent has either remained the same (55.9 percent) or increased (44.1 percent); trial attorneys feel that this trend has increased (81.5 percent). Overall,
pediatric dentists and trial attorneys disagree on whether parental consent is required for specific patient types. Moreover, the two groups agree on the type of consent necessary. For 20 dental procedures (54 percent) and disagree on 17 dental procedures (46 percent). Finally, most trial attorneys and pediatric dentists feel that conforming to the doctrine of informed consent reduces or eliminates future malpractice litigation.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IUPUI/oai:scholarworks.iupui.edu:1805/3680 |
| Date | January 1988 |
| Creators | Buccino, Michael A. |
| Contributors | Avery, David R., Karlson, Henry C., Jones, James E. (James Earl), 1950-, Johnson, Bruce E., Gillman, Jeffrey B., Vash, Bruce W. |
| Source Sets | Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds