Return to search

Application and analysis of just in time teaching methods in a calculus course

Doctor of Philosophy / Department of Mathematics / Andrew G. Bennett / "Just In Time Teaching" (JiTT) is a teaching practice that utilizes web based
technology to collect information about students' background knowledge prior to attending lecture.
Traditionally, students answer either multiple choice, short answer, or brief essay questions outside
of class; based on student responses, instructors adjust their lectures "just-in-time."
In this study, modified JiTT techniques in the form of online review modules were applied to a first
semester calculus course at a large midwestern state university during the spring 2012 term.
The review modules covered algebra concepts and skills relevant to the
new material presented in calculus lecture
(the "just-in-time" adjustment of the calculus lectures was not implemented in this teaching experiment).
The reviews were part of the course grade. Instead of being administered purely "just-in-time," the reviews
were assigned ahead of time as part of the online homework component of Calculus-I.
While previous studies have investigated the use of traditional JiTT techniques in math courses and reported student
satisfaction with such teaching tools, these studies have not addressed gains in student achievement with respect
to specific calculus topics. The goal of this study was to investigate the latter, and to determine whether timing
of the reviews plays a role in bettering student performance.
Student progress on weekly Calculus-I online assignments was tracked in
spring of 2012 and compared to student scores from weekly Calculus-I online assignments from spring 2011, when modified JiTT instruction was not available. For select Calculus-I online assignments during the spring 2012 term,
we discovered that the review modules significantly increased the number of
students receiving perfect scores, even when the reviews were not purely administered ``just-in-time." Analysis of performance, success of review assignments, and future implications are also discussed.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:KSU/oai:krex.k-state.edu:2097/14957
Date January 1900
CreatorsNatarajan, Rekha
PublisherKansas State University
Source SetsK-State Research Exchange
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeDissertation

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds