Background: Surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CLRM) depends on resectability that is currently based on the CT scan. With the PET/CT scan, a more accurate pre-operative assessment of resectability may be possible.
Methods: A Cochrane-based diagnostic test systematic review and a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies on PET scans were conducted. Lastly, a diagnostic decision analysis model was created to assess the cost-effectiveness of the technology.
Results: PET/CT scans was equally sensitive for hepatic metastases and more sensitive for extra-hepatic metastases compared to CT scans. A cost-savings of PET scans for CRLM is identified; with decision modelling demonstrating a cost-savings with the addition of PET/CT scans to the current clinical algorithm.
Conclusion: There is cautious support for the addition of PET/CT scans to the pre-operative assessment in CRLM. Unnecessary surgery may be prevented, thus decreasing wait times. Future endeavours include finding, evaluating and validating methodology for appropriate effectiveness measures. / Health Technology Assessement
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:AEU.10048/1871 |
| Date | 06 1900 |
| Creators | Patel, Seema |
| Contributors | Bigam, David (Surgery), Ohinmaa, Arto (Public Health Sciences), Saunders, Duncan (Public Health Sciences), Jacobs, Philip (Public Health Sciences) |
| Source Sets | Library and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | 2496685 bytes, application/pdf |
| Relation | Patel, S et al. PET/CT scans vs. CT scans for detecting colorectal liver metastases: A diagnostic systematic review. Annals of Surgery, in press |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds