Return to search

Reconsidering Similarity in an Agent-oriented Account of Scientific Modeling

In this thesis, I present a novel account of scientific modeling that achieves the stability and generalizability of static approaches with the flexibility and practical
relevance of diachronic approaches. In this account, modeling is characterized by the use
of a similarity relation for the purpose of surrogate reasoning. Many criticisms of similarity are based on the fact that there is no way to objectively assess similarity
between two things that share some, but not all, features. This account does not rely on
the inherently flawed notion of objectively assessing similarity. Instead, the focus is on subjective assessment of similarity, within the specific context of an agent using the similarity for surrogate reasoning. This account captures the diversity of models while providing coherence among common features and functions, as evidenced by application
to a series of interrelated examples in a case study from mid-twentieth century cognitive psychology.
The similarity/difference account advocated in this thesis is particularly significant because its demonstrated success, evidenced by the case study, dispels several
misconceptions about the study of scientific models. Advocates of static approaches claim that a diachronic approach cannot provide the generalizability necessary for a
unified account, but the functional and agent-oriented similarity/difference account
proves otherwise. Advocates of practice-based approaches often suggest that imilarity is too restrictive to capture the diversity of scientific models, but the similarity/difference account demonstrates that this concern only applies to a radically naturalized concept of similarity. As part of an agent-oriented account, a non-naturalized concept of similarity can be flexible enough to capture the full range of scientific models. Combining a diachronic approach with the similarity relation usually associated with static approaches
results in an account that can circumvent the issues usually associated with either
diachronic approaches or similarity alone.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:OTU.1807/33897
Date06 December 2012
CreatorsAbounader-Sofinowski, Brooke
ContributorsBrown, James Robert, Baigrie, Brian
Source SetsLibrary and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada
Languageen_ca
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis

Page generated in 0.002 seconds