Introduction: Despite evidence in favour of cholecystectomy early during first presenting admission for most patients with acute calculous cholecystitis, variation in the timing of cholecystectomy remains evident worldwide. This dissertation characterizes the extent of variation within a large regional healthcare system, as well as addresses gaps in our current understanding of the clinical consequences and costs associated with early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
Methods: A population-based retrospective cohort of patients admitted emergently with acute cholecystitis was identified from administrative databases for the province of Ontario, Canada. First, the extent of variation across hospitals in the performance of early cholecystectomy (within 7 days of emergency department presentation) was characterized. Second, among patients discharged without cholecystectomy following index admission, the risk of recurrent gallstone symptoms over time was quantified. Third, operative outcomes of early cholecystectomy were compared to those of delayed cholecystectomy. Finally, a cost-utility analysis compared healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-year gains associated with three management strategies for acute cholecystitis: early cholecystectomy, delayed cholecystectomy and watchful waiting, where cholecystectomy is performed urgently if recurrent gallstone symptoms arise.
Results: The rate of early cholecystectomy varied widely across hospitals in Ontario (median rate 51%, interquartile range 25-71%), even after adjusting for patient characteristics (median odds ratio 3.7). Among patients discharged without cholecystectomy following an index cholecystitis admission, the probability of a gallstone-related emergency department visit or hospital admission was 19% by 12 weeks following discharge. Early cholecystectomy was associated with a lower risk of major bile duct injury (0.28%vs.0.53%, RR=0.53, 95%CI 0.31–0.90, p=0.025). No significant differences were observed in terms of open cholecystectomy (15%vs.14%, RR=1.07, 95%CI 0.99–1.16, p=0.10) or in conversion among laparoscopic cases (11%vs.10%, RR=1.02, 95%CI 0.93–1.13, p=0.68). Early cholecystectomy was on average less costly ($6,905 per person) and more effective (4.20 QALYs per person) than delayed cholecystectomy ($8,511; 4.18 QALYs per person) or watchful waiting ($7,274; 3.99 QALYs per person).
Conclusions: Early cholecystectomy offers a benefit over delayed cholecystectomy in terms of major bile duct injury, mitigates the risk of recurrent symptoms, and is associated with the greatest QALY gains at the least cost.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:OTU.1807/43545 |
| Date | 08 January 2014 |
| Creators | de Mestral, Charles William Armand |
| Contributors | Nathens, Avery B. |
| Source Sets | Library and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada |
| Language | en_ca |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0034 seconds