Rapidly evolving Internet and web technologies and international efforts on standardization of learning object metadata enable learners in a web-based educational system ubiquitous access to multiple learning resources. It is becoming more necessary and possible to provide individualized help with selecting learning materials to make the most suitable choice among many alternatives.<p>
A framework for individualized learning object selection, called Eliminating and Optimized Selection (EOS), is presented in this thesis. This framework contains a suggestion for extending learning object metadata specifications and presents an approach to selecting a short list of suitable learning objects appropriate for an individual learner in a particular learning context. The key features of the EOS approach are to evaluate the suitability of a learning object in its situated context and to refine the evaluation by using available historical usage information about the learning object. A Learning Preference Survey was conducted to discover and determine the relationships between the importance of learning object attributes and learner characteristics. Two weight models, a Bayesian Network Weight Model and a Naïve Bayes Model, were derived from the data collected in the survey. Given a particular learner, both of these models provide a set of personal weights for learning object features required by the individualized learning object selection.<p>
The optimized selection approach was demonstrated and verified using simulated selections. Seventy simulated learning objects were evaluated for three simulated learners within simulated learning contexts. Both the Bayesian Network Weight Model and the Naïve Bayes Model were used in the selection of simulated learning objects. The results produced by the two algorithms were compared, and the two algorithms highly correlated each other in the domain where the testing was conducted.<p>
A Learning Object Selection Study was performed to validate the learning object selection algorithms against human experts. By comparing machine selection and human experts selection, we found out that the agreement between machine selection and human experts selection is higher than agreement among the human experts alone.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:SSU.etd-05122009-093502 |
| Date | 15 May 2009 |
| Creators | Liu, Jian |
| Contributors | Greer, J. E. (Jim) |
| Publisher | University of Saskatchewan |
| Source Sets | Library and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-05122009-093502/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Saskatchewan or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds