Abstract
There are over 60 companies, which have had the experience in TPM implementation, but only 12 companies have got TPM Award until 2000. We may pose this issue, since they have the same TPM system and similar implementing structure/procedure or even the identical consultant, they have obtained total different result, what on
earth it is? I attribute this different result to the incitement of teamwork, as well as different management style which may leads to the different achievement of TPM.
Herewith, we will review firstly the theoretic character of TPM, and then study the theory of leadership, teamwork and synergy. After that, we will work out the inference of successful mode for the implementation of TPM.
According to theoretic inference, a questionnaire was made, which had been listed questions on the basic information of company, the management style of key leader and promoting team of TPM. Above all, TPM performance is also included.
This report will review all theoretic inference, and compare to the statistical result of questionnaire, which makes me organize a practical as well as successful mode, i.e. proper leadership and appropriate teamwork leads to high performance of TPM activity.
Key Word: Total Productive Management (TPM), MP (Maintenance Prevention) Information, Management Style, Team Work and Synergy.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:NSYSU/oai:NSYSU:etd-0723101-173028 |
| Date | 23 July 2001 |
| Creators | Lee, Mau-Hsin |
| Contributors | Iuan-Yuan Lu, Tsuang-Yih Kuo, Tong-Yuan Ku |
| Publisher | NSYSU |
| Source Sets | NSYSU Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive |
| Language | Cholon |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0723101-173028 |
| Rights | unrestricted, Copyright information available at source archive |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds