Return to search

Thinking Styles and Interactions in Junior high school Classrooms

Abstract
The study investigated the thinking styles of teachers and students in junior high schools and, by using R. J. Sternberg¡¦s theoretical framework of thinking styles, further explored (a) their associations with teaching practices as well as students¡¦ performance (i.e., satisfaction of instructional practices, academic achievement), (b) the influence of the similarities of teachers¡¦ and students¡¦ thinking styles on students¡¦ performance, and (c) factors involved in teachers¡¦/students¡¦ thinking styles.
A total of 793 participants (277 teachers, 516 7th-grade students) were studied. Data collected through rating scales, self-report, checklist, classroom observation and semi-structured interview of teachers were analyzed with t-test, Pearson product-moment correlation, MANOVA, and canonical correlation analysis.
The results indicated : a) among the 5 background variables involved in teachers¡¦ thinking styles, both ¡§parents¡¦ education¡¨ and ¡§teaching subjects¡¨ did not show significant relations with any of the 7 teachers¡¦ thinking styles, but the other 3 variables (i.e., ¡§gender¡¨, ¡§age¡¨, ¡§teaching experience in terms of years¡¨) did, b) among the 3 background variables involved in students¡¦ thinking styles, ¡§parents¡¦ education¡¨ showed no significant relations with any of the 13 students¡¦ thinking styles, but ¡§gender¡¨ and ¡§birth order¡¨ did, c) teachers¡¦ thinking styles were significantly related with their background variables and teaching practices, d) among the 7 kinds of teaching practices, the ¡§developmental method¡¨ showed significant relations with 3 types of students¡¦ thinking styles, including ¡§legislative¡¨, ¡§external¡¨, ¡§liberal¡¨, e) among 7 teaching practices, students showed greatest satisfaction and highest academic achievement in ¡§rote style teaching,¡¨ f) academically underachieved students tend to be more of ¡§global style of thinking,¡¨ and g) no significant relations between teachers¡¦ and students¡¦ thinking styles were found, nor were the similarities of teachers¡¦ and students¡¦ thinking styles on students¡¦ satisfaction of instructional practices and their academic achievement.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:NSYSU/oai:NSYSU:etd-0726101-133034
Date26 July 2001
CreatorsChou, Yu-Shuang
ContributorsY Cheng, Chin Guey, G Chen
PublisherNSYSU
Source SetsNSYSU Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive
LanguageCholon
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0726101-133034
Rightsunrestricted, Copyright information available at source archive

Page generated in 0.0023 seconds